Which type of Gamer are you?
So I was reading Kotaku just now and I read this article:
http://kotaku.com/5857864/which-of-these-27-gamer-classifications-do-you-fall-under
I thought it would be a pretty good discussion topic, so I say we should discuss it.
I personally can't pin myself on any of those "classifications", as I could fit into several of those.
I guess thats due to my unusually balanced personality, that fluctuates madly between extemes.
http://kotaku.com/5857864/which-of-these-27-gamer-classifications-do-you-fall-under
I thought it would be a pretty good discussion topic, so I say we should discuss it.
I personally can't pin myself on any of those "classifications", as I could fit into several of those.
I guess thats due to my unusually balanced personality, that fluctuates madly between extemes.
Sign in to comment in this discussion.
Comments
But yeah, I'll play just about anything just to give it a try and see if i enjoy the game.
Also; you got me to visit Kotaku. You fiends. You're maniacs! All of you!
(I have multiple Telltale series that have been purchased but not started yet....)
Ummmm... these classifications really do not work. They are neither mutually exclusive nor do the individual stereotypes comprise pieces of gamer "characters" that necessarily belong together. Also, they find such flaws in their stereotypes that you would not really want to pick one of them and pinpoint it on yourself.
The "Rebounder" strikes me as an extreme case of this. What if you have quite the gaming history (including the original GameBoy, the NES, the C128 and the Amiga 600), but having skipped the present console generation and despising many present copy protection mechanisms, just find yourself out of games for your PC? It is true that every of the very few games you'd treat yourself with would be somehow "new and interesting", but having seen all the old ideas, you might recognize that a lot of repetition is at work pretty fast, leaving the disappointing purchase in the dust, but you'd hardly "quit unexpectedly" then. I fully expect not to finish "The Witcher - Extended edition", which I started three weeks ago. It's nice, but it's just too damn long, I don't have the time for it and you're just running from point A to B and right back most of the time. I'm old enough to demand a more concise experience.
Also, if you often clean house and sell games, you'd get rid of the games you are least attached to. I have done so many times, and I can safely say that 50% of the PC games I have bought in the last ten years have ended up on ebay, while others - despite the fact that they run most crappily or not at all on Windows 7 - still remain most prized possessions. And on the games I've played, I'm always at hand with a strong and hopefully informed opinion, so there goes that idea.
But concerning those last two sentences: guilty as charged. For me, games age as well, and I am not likely to overlook flaws in yesterday's games that have become less common in today's entertainment products. As for remakes, the more you are attached to the original, the less likely you are to accept the changes a remake necessarily makes.
Truth: I have more games in my collection than I've actually played for over a half hour.
However I found them all to be either too interlinked or just not really fitting much of anything.
Find out what gamer type you are!