Your vehicle?

edited November 2012 in The Walking Dead
What kind of a vehicle would you want to have in the Zombie Apocalypse?

An RV?A jeep?A van?A fast car?A truck?

I don't wanna hear any stupid replies like "a tank" or "a bullet-proof car" and bullocks.

A Land Rover jeep would be fine for me but if there are more than 3-4 people a nice RV would be awesome!
«13

Comments

  • edited October 2012
    1248015482_OP_paper_truck.jpg
  • edited October 2012
    Helicopters are vehicles right? Those :p
  • edited October 2012
    A hummer marauder because it is best vehicle for defence.
  • edited October 2012
    Arcanine wrote: »
    1248015482_OP_paper_truck.jpg

    Especially if it turns in to a 50ft tall robot!
  • edited October 2012
    A truck-train ( sorry i'm quebecer dunno how to said that) like two 53' attached together, one citern gas, and the other with canned food
  • edited October 2012
    i dont get why lee and them didnt just use the train as their base
    its basically a frikken armored vehicle
  • edited October 2012
    "Get a boat, That's the plan" Kenny said
  • edited October 2012
    Bicycle. Cars are great until you run out of gas, and that'll happen fast. I'd have bicycles handy at whatever my home base is for when that inevitably happens. They're fast, light, and are the most energy efficient form of transportation man has ever invented. My group and I can keep making runs on bikes to gather supplies while all you people are hoofing it along the highway.
  • edited October 2012
    Armored Car.
  • edited October 2012
    Foinikas wrote: »
    What kind of a vehicle would you want to have in the Zombie Apocalypse?

    An RV?A jeep?A van?A fast car?A truck?

    I don't wanna hear any stupid replies like "a tank" or "a bullet-proof car" and bullocks.

    A Land Rover jeep would be fine for me but if there are more than 3-4 people a nice RV would be awesome!

    Claiming that a viable option like a tank is a "stupid reply" is stupid in itself.
    For those that live within a reasonable distance from military base it gives them the option of obtaining a tank. I personally would go after a "Stryker" which is an APC
  • edited October 2012
    A tank, or an aircraft for that matter, would be stupid unless you know how to operate and maintain it. :p
  • edited October 2012
    a horse and a bayonet :guybrush:
  • edited October 2012
    DreadMagus wrote: »
    A tank, or an aircraft for that matter, would be stupid unless you know how to operate and maintain it. :p

    Definitely a tank. I was a 19K20 in the Army and we primarily used the M1A1 main battle tank.
  • edited October 2012
    Skizoker wrote: »
    Definitely a tank. I was a 19K20 in the Army and we primarily used the M1A1 main battle tank.
    Foinikas wrote: »
    ...
    I don't wanna hear any stupid replies like "a tank" or "a bullet-proof car" and bullocks.
    ...
    facepalm.jpg

    P.S. monster truck ftw! :)
    zztruck.jpg
  • edited October 2012
    Skizoker wrote: »
    Definitely a tank. I was a 19K20 in the Army and we primarily used the M1A1 main battle tank.

    Dude, I totally want to be on your team in a ZA. :)
  • mz3mz3
    edited October 2012
  • edited October 2012
    distortion wrote: »
    Bicycle. Cars are great until you run out of gas, and that'll happen fast. I'd have bicycles handy at whatever my home base is for when that inevitably happens. They're fast, light, and are the most energy efficient form of transportation man has ever invented. My group and I can keep making runs on bikes to gather supplies while all you people are hoofing it along the highway.

    Totally agree here. Anything running on gas is only a short term solution to mobility. Especially the options like Tanks, Trucks and of course all the big american gas-guzzlers are just one way to extend the inevitable.

    I'd go for an RV to begin with though. You can live in it, you can barricade it if needed, and it has room for.. Bikes! Either hang them out back or have them inside. You can use the bikes for missions from basecamp. They are quick, quiet, easilly maintained, very energy efficient and only slightly less mobile than going on foot.

    Best bit: They can ensure your gas reserves are extended because you do not need to use gas when going out of base camp.

    When it comes to so-called 'unrealistic' options. I guess the tank is considered one because it is literally out of gas very quickly. But many big cars have that same problem really..
  • edited October 2012
    Devlonir wrote: »
    Totally agree here. Anything running on gas is only a short term solution to mobility. Especially the options like Tanks, Trucks and of course all the big american gas-guzzlers are just one way to extend the inevitable.

    So what you gonna do if your legs get wounded? If you will find some disabled man that needs your help?
  • edited October 2012
    Istibul wrote: »
    So what you gonna do if your legs get wounded? If you will find some disabled man that needs your help?

    Leg wounds are near death warrants in the ZA anyway. Doesn't matter what kind of vehicle you use. You will need help from someone else to reliably get away regardless.

    Also, really bad leg wounds also cause you to not really be able to drive a car as well. So point invalidated.

    Also, many bikes have carriage frames where they can hold someone else in the back. These would be the bikes best suited for the ZA (not the 1000 dollar mountainbikes) So you can help someone injured back to your camp, as well as use it to carry supplies.
  • GudmooreGudmoore Banned
    edited October 2012
    pirate_ship_for_sale.jpg
  • edited October 2012
    FFS I stressed it: No stupid answers!No tanks,no weird stuff!

    Now this is what you get:

    3d_rv_m_int.jpg

    628_620Berth20Motorhome20-20Cutaway20large.jpg
  • edited October 2012
    Foinikas wrote: »
    FFS I stressed it: No stupid answers!No tanks,no weird stuff


    I find it hilarious that you think a tank or other military vehicle is a "stupid or weird" answer. Someone answering the millenium falcon is a "stupid/weird" answer. Using a tactical/fighting vehicle to survive in a post apocalyptic world only makes more sense than running around in say a corvette or a ferrari. You're going to run into highways that are blocked or unpassable in any "normal" vehicle. Having a vehicle built to be able to handle running into and pushing through wrecks like that makes a lot of sense to me. Seeing as how there are countless numbers of retired military in the U.S. you are bound to run into at least on survivor who would know something about the operation/maintenance of those types of vehicles. My family alone has a retired army tank mechanic and an active duty Stryker mechanic in it. So I believe I would be able to keep both types of vehicles running until the supply of diesel runs out and seeing how most people would be running for gasoline power vehicles I don't think it would run out too quickly.
  • edited October 2012
    Seriously mate,where will the average Joe find a tank and how will he drive/use it?You might be an exception but realistically speaking the vast majority of people will go for jeeps,vans,RVs and small cars :P
  • edited October 2012
    ArmoredCar.jpg
  • edited October 2012
    Now a fast car is a good idea
    NascarPic1.jpg
    Letting Duck drive is not!
    NascarPic2.jpg
  • edited October 2012
    ^^^^^ Nice I think letting duck drive would be kind of fun to watch



    Foinikas wrote: »
    Seriously mate,where will the average Joe find a tank and how will he drive/use it?You might be an exception but realistically speaking the vast majority of people will go for jeeps,vans,RVs and small cars :P

    I don't know what country you live in but in the U.S. as far as where the "average Joe" would find a tank is A: a military base(and in the U.S. there are states that have multiple bases within it's borders) B: In the event of a ZA the military would be called out to combat the hordes of undead attacking, some would turn some would run leaving behind the Tanks, APCs, HumVees and other vehicles driven. Driving a tank takes some getting used to but can be mastered within a few hours(getting used to the T handle controls would be the biggest match), driving a Stryker is pretty much like driving a car gas pedal, brake pedal and steering wheel and the major advantage to either is they are completely self contained no windows that can be broken in too easily leaving occupants safe to drive away and crush any zombies in their path. As far as everyone else grabbing cars, jeeps, vans, RVs, etc. all those run on gasoline leaving the diesel supplies for me and my Tank/APC which runs on a Duramax Diesel and an Allison 6speed Transmission(Which is the same combination installed in most 1 ton General Motors Pickup Trucks So anyone with knowledge working on those in the dealerships would have a leg up on maintenance).
  • edited October 2012
    Mexican tank

    mexican%20tank.jpg
  • edited October 2012
    badass! ^^^
  • edited October 2012
    Foinikas wrote: »
    Seriously mate,where will the average Joe find a tank and how will he drive/use it?You might be an exception but realistically speaking the vast majority of people will go for jeeps,vans,RVs and small cars :P

    You asked what WE would use.

    I would use a tank. I was very good at what I did and I'm sure I could train others to use a tank as well. Yes, getting diesel or jet fuel would be tough, but really if I had a tank I'm quite confident I could take what I wanted. The problem is getting one and getting it stocked with ammo and fuel, but once I had that I believe keeping it resupplied would be possible.

    Now, say I had never spent time in the army on tanks then I would go for a large truck. F350 or something similar or an Up-Armored Humvee.
  • edited October 2012
    Devlonir wrote: »
    Leg wounds are near death warrants in the ZA anyway. Doesn't matter what kind of vehicle you use. You will need help from someone else to reliably get away regardless.

    Also, really bad leg wounds also cause you to not really be able to drive a car as well. So point invalidated.

    Also, many bikes have carriage frames where they can hold someone else in the back. These would be the bikes best suited for the ZA (not the 1000 dollar mountainbikes) So you can help someone injured back to your camp, as well as use it to carry supplies.

    The Biggest problem in a Zombie apocalypse is food so
    No food= No energy
    No Energy= How the fck are you gonna use a bike ??
    Bike is useless= You have to walk biggest mistake.
    You have a car?= can use it as a mini house.
    You have a car?= only press gas you dont need energy for that.
    out of gas?= Then your death but its the same for a bike for a bike you need energy for a car gas What's the different ?!?!
  • edited October 2012
    Oh gee aparently in USA it's raining tanks and there's one in every corner....
  • edited October 2012
    Foinikas wrote: »
    Oh gee aparently in USA it's raining tanks and there's one in every corner....

    Well considering I was stationed at 2 bases in Georgia alone that has tanks I am pretty dang sure I could find one. I currently live less than 50 miles from the nearest base that has tanks.

    Most states national guard even has them, but there is no telling how many Texas still has. Thousands I'm sure.

    You act like they are rare. For the average person I guess it would appear that way.
  • edited October 2012
    bttf-delorean-dmc-12-628.jpg

    definitely -- delorean dmc-12

    take me back to the pre-apocalypse !
  • edited October 2012
    Skizoker wrote: »
    Well considering I was stationed at 2 bases in Georgia alone that has tanks I am pretty dang sure I could find one. I currently live less than 50 miles from the nearest base that has tanks.

    Most states national guard even has them, but there is no telling how many Texas still has. Thousands I'm sure.

    You act like they are rare. For the average person I guess it would appear that way.

    I was just looking quickly for a news article I read last week about a huge storage of tanks somewhere in California. It was about how many their were and not being used.. just sitting there.
  • edited October 2012
    Don't take me wrong,I LOVE TANKS!I'm the guy who loves tanks and not jet fighters,but telling me "i will have a tank in the zombie apocalypse" is like all those kids who go like "OH I WILL HAVE A ROCKET LANCUHER AND I AM GOINAA TAKES MACHINE GUN AND PEW PEW KILL ALL OF THEM".Know what I mean?
  • edited October 2012
    Foinikas wrote: »
    Don't take me wrong,I LOVE TANKS!I'm the guy who loves tanks and not jet fighters,but telling me "i will have a tank in the zombie apocalypse" is like all those kids who go like "OH I WILL HAVE A ROCKET LANCUHER AND I AM GOINAA TAKES MACHINE GUN AND PEW PEW KILL ALL OF THEM".Know what I mean?

    Yea, you're trying to be realistic.. The vast majority to survivors in a ZA would not have access to a tank or other military weapons/vehicles. But there are those who could. I remember watching the show as the group passed by over-run military area's and wonder why no one is grabbing the weapons, or vehicles.
  • edited October 2012
    A solar powered hybrid...hopefully by the time the zombie apocalypse comes these will have been invented.
  • edited October 2012
    Foinikas wrote: »
    Don't take me wrong,I LOVE TANKS!I'm the guy who loves tanks and not jet fighters,but telling me "i will have a tank in the zombie apocalypse" is like all those kids who go like "OH I WILL HAVE A ROCKET LANCUHER AND I AM GOINAA TAKES MACHINE GUN AND PEW PEW KILL ALL OF THEM".Know what I mean?

    Don't get me wrong I'm fully understanding as to trying to make people keep it realistic but you've got to take into account the fact that there is the strong possibility that someone with working knowledge of those types of vehicles would not only want to get one but also be in the vicinity to obtain one. With the amount of active duty and retired military in the U.S. the odds get higher(instead of 1 out of 100 you could realistically have 9-12 out of 100).
    WowMutt wrote: »
    Yea, you're trying to be realistic.. The vast majority to survivors in a ZA would not have access to a tank or other military weapons/vehicles. But there are those who could. I remember watching the show as the group passed by over-run military area's and wonder why no one is grabbing the weapons, or vehicles.

    I thought the exact thing, an abandoned military post/outpost would be a haven for discarded weapons and ammunition.
  • edited October 2012
    Foinikas wrote: »
    Don't take me wrong,I LOVE TANKS!I'm the guy who loves tanks and not jet fighters,but telling me "i will have a tank in the zombie apocalypse" is like all those kids who go like "OH I WILL HAVE A ROCKET LANCUHER AND I AM GOINAA TAKES MACHINE GUN AND PEW PEW KILL ALL OF THEM".Know what I mean?

    You are right the average person would not have a clue what to do with a tank. But, I just happen to be someone who spent over 10 years on the M1A1 and does know what to do with a tank.

    So, I can't change my answer. That is what type of vehicle I would look for first.

    Here is a pic of me and my platoon when we were training to go to Bosnia sometime in 1995.

    I'm the 2nd guy above the main gun.

    eawno.jpg

    Can click here for larger size

    Well, for some reason this forum is only showing a thumbnail version of the picture and I can't figure out how to show a larger size.
  • edited October 2012
    A weaponized RV, the reason is it can kill all the zombies in the way, has a space at the back if someone wants to sleep or eat.
This discussion has been closed.