About Justin and Danny.....

2

Comments

  • edited July 2013
    Yeah


    That could be anything though, mabey Russ met Vince and danny when they still had there orange Jumpsuites on ( unlikley due to time number of days passed ) or mabey Danny let slip why he was in Jail and russ did not trust him...but it does sound like eh tried to rape someone again.....lol dammit danny
  • edited July 2013
    I found that odd too. I think its also odd that if you shoot justin, vince doesnt go with tavia... I shot justin first play through bc danny sounded more sincere in caring about vince.
  • edited July 2013
    Again, no confirmation if he raped kids

    Again when Justin and Danny are talking they say Danny was convicted for raping a 15 year old girl. The only difference is Danny says "he didn't do it".
  • edited July 2013
    Again when Justin and Danny are talking they say Danny was convicted for raping a 15 year old girl. The only difference is Danny says "he didn't do it".

    Again, Justin was making fun of Danny's crime, like what Danny said about Justin's crime and how he made fun of it.
    Also you could tell when Vince was at the option of saying what his crime was, Justin made fun of Vince's crime by saying he was a priest and touched little kids
  • edited July 2013
    Again, Justin was making fun of Danny's crime, like what Danny said about Justin's crime and how he made fun of it.
    Also you could tell when Vince was at the option of saying what his crime was, Justin made fun of Vince's crime by saying he was a priest and touched little kids

    No that isn't how it goes. And it's Danny who ask him if he was a priest. Danny admits that he was convicted of being raping a 15 year old girl, all he says is that he didn't do it. Both Justin and Danny know your crime if you tell them what it was.

    Justin doesn't "tease" Danny he is being honest about him "fucking that girl's life up.". The same way he is being honest when he tells Danny not to intervene when Crabtree chokes out Jerry, because they don't want any of that "shit".
  • edited July 2013
    Brock Samson, you do know we do not have enough information to know if he actually did rape the girl, right? It could have been a wrongful conviction. Unlike Vince, we KNOW he killed someone for sure. And Justin pretty much admits his crime.

    With Danny's, it's a lot more vague. I think Telltale intended it for it to be that way. Wit Justin, it was a clear cut white collar that robbed rich people of money, a guy who was selfish and tended to a smart mouth. Danny was doing convicted something wrong, but indications give that he may not have done it, and is a brave loyal friend.

    But that's the point. We don't know the extent of what he did. And I find it very odd that you would impose the fact that he did 100% when in fact, we will probably never know, because Telltale never intended for us to know the 100% of his crime.
  • edited July 2013
    No that isn't how it goes. And it's Danny who ask him if he was a priest. Danny admits that he was convicted of being raping a 15 year old girl, all he says is that he didn't do it. Both Justin and Danny know your crime if you tell them what it was.

    Justin doesn't "tease" Danny he is being honest about him "fucking that girl's life up.". The same way he is being honest when he tells Danny not to intervene when Crabtree chokes out Jerry, because they don't want any of that "shit".

    Im looking it up, youre bending the lines

    When Justin said he stole a girls virginity, Danny replies "Hey what do I have to tell you?" basically meaning that Justin is just trying to piss him off because he raped someone, Justin later goes on that how old was she, Danny says "It aint like that." which meant that he raped a woman

    Seriously Im done arguing with you because we're just not getting anywhere, hes a rapist, plain and simple, and we dont know if he raped kids or not. Quit skewing facts and just deal with it until TT releases the next season
  • edited July 2013
    it does not even matter he is dead either way, he died because you shot him and the walkers came or he died another way with Vince, he will not be back.
  • edited July 2013
    Brock Samson, you do know we do not have enough information to know if he actually did rape the girl, right? .

    There are hints throughout the whole damn game that he is guilty. I've already listed them out once. The biggest being Russell who thanks God Danny died before they met up with the girls. Hinting further at the fact that Danny acted out his impulses as time went by even if you save him. But whatever save the rapist if you want. He's dead in my play through and I'm happy about it.
  • edited July 2013
    it does not even matter he is dead either way, he died because you shot him and the walkers came or he died another way with Vince, he will not be back.

    And I find it bullshit why, and please dont give me this crap like "hes dead, hurr durr, omfg why u arguing cuz he dead deal with it, hur dur"
  • edited July 2013
    Brock Samson, you do know we do not have enough information to know if he actually did rape the girl, right? It could have been a wrongful conviction.

    No, what Brock Samson is complaining is that APPARENTLY Danny rapes little kids, but we dont know if he did or not. Brock is going through this mindset that he did even though theres no concrete evidence if he raped a little girl or not
  • edited July 2013
    There are hints throughout the whole damn game that he is guilty. I've already listed them out once. The biggest being Russell who thanks God Danny died before they met up with the girls. Hinting further at the fact that Danny acted out his impulses as time went by even if you save him. But whatever save the rapist if you want. He's dead in my play through and I'm happy about it.
    I actually don't save him. In any case, Russell trusts no one. You know Becca? He's like that, except we know why he trust no one, because his experience guys like Nate. Russell is hardly a fair judge of character. Russell also implies he doesn't like taking orders. He actually seems to hate being part of a group. He's also very judgmental about people, but like I said before, we know why.
    No, what Brock Samson is complaining is that APPARENTLY Danny rapes little kids, but we dont know if he did or not. Brock is going through this mindset that he did even though theres no concrete evidence if he raped a little girl or not

    That's my point - there is no concrete evidence. Russell's assertions are hardly strong evidence, considering his trust issues.

    Also Brock Samson, heard of statutory rape? It's when a minor consents but is legally not allowed to do so by law. The game never said what the exact legal rape classification. In fact, we never know the exact circumstances.

    With Vince, we KNOW he did it. With Justin, he pretty much admits he did it, and they go into detail what he did. They never go into much detail on what happened with Danny. As for him admitting "doing bad things", that's so vague, everyone has done bad things. That doesn't mean much.
  • edited July 2013
    lOOK BENEATH dANNYS lATINO TOUGH GUY IMAGINE IS A YOUNG MAN WANTING TO LEARN....AND BENEATH THAT S A RAPIST
  • edited July 2013
    lOOK BENEATH dANNYS lATINO TOUGH GUY IMAGINE IS A YOUNG MAN WANTING TO LEARN....AND BENEATH THAT S A RAPIST
    ...say what? Also, seriously, caps lock much?
  • edited July 2013
    ...say what? Also, seriously, caps lock much?

    Hey 2008 called, they want there saying back!
  • edited July 2013
    Also Brock Samson, heard of statutory rape? It's when a minor consents but is legally not allowed to do so by law. The game never said what the exact legal rape classification. In fact, we never know the exact circumstances.

    You do not get sent to a maximum security prison for having sex with a 15 year old girl. You have to at least be a level three sexual offender, which means he was convicted of raping the girl. If only had sex with her he would have been sent to a minimal security prison with dead beat Dads who don't pay their alimony and guys who stole things worth a couple hundred bucks.

    They don't put you in maximum security prison with murders, high tier thieves, gang bangers, and bank robbers for having sex with a 15 year old. You do know there are different levels of prisons right? Vince is a convicted murder he isn't going to the county jail.
  • edited July 2013
    Hey 2008 called, they want there saying back!
    That's great, thanks for stop doing caps lock. I knew you were smarter than a thirteen year-old.
  • edited July 2013
    Evil Intent, I did not mean it like that, all I say is he is dead, that is all and there is no way of knowing who was telling the truth or not, I guess it was not a kid but I don't know that.
  • edited July 2013
    That's great, thanks for stop doing caps lock. I knew you were smarter than a thirteen year-old.

    I dont have to take that from a Jew lol ( family guy )
  • edited July 2013
    You do not get sent to a maximum security prison for having sex with a 15 year old girl. You have to at least be a level three sexual offender, which means he was convicted of raping the girl. If only had sex with her he would have been sent to a minimal security prison with dead beat Dads who don't pay their alimony and guys who stole things worth a couple hundred bucks.

    They don't put you in maximum security prison with murders, high tier thieves, gang bangers, and bank robbers for having sex with a 15 year old. You do know there are different levels of prisons right? Vince is a convicted murder he isn't going to the county jail.

    Except we don't know if they were going to same jail. And to throw the point back at you, why would they send Justin to a maximum security jail? It's a white collar crime.
  • edited July 2013
    This getting out of hand fast, lets just calm down, we eat and then we will talk about it.
  • edited July 2013
    Evil Intent, I did not mean it like that, all I say is he is dead, that is all and there is no way of knowing who was telling the truth or not, I guess it was not a kid but I don't know that.

    I know, Im venting on the whole reason of why Vince bails on Justin/Danny at the prison bus, not Dannys death
    I dont have to take that from a Jew lol

    Im offensive and I find this Jewish
  • edited July 2013
    Except we don't know if they were going to same jail. And to throw the point back at you, why would they send Justin to a maximum security jail? It's a white collar crime.

    He's going because of the level of money he stole. He claims he stole over 100 million dollars which puts him at the highest level of convicted robbery.
  • edited July 2013
    I dont have to take that from a Jew lol
    Except I'm not a Jew. Or Jewish. Or even believe in Judaism. And to think you were smarter than thirteen year old... maybe you are not. Too bad.
  • edited July 2013
    He's going because of the level of money he stole. He claims he stole over 100 million dollars which puts him at the highest level of convicted robbery.

    You do realize that Justin is a complacent liar right?

    IE: Lied at the stand, claims hes good at lying
  • edited July 2013
    You realise its mostly Family Guy quotes now?
  • edited July 2013
    I'm still loving the support for Danny cause I knew I wasn't the only one who agreed with their original gut feeling on saving him. If I recall, when I played 70% of the players had shot Justin.
  • edited July 2013
    He's going because of the level of money he stole. He claims he stole over 100 million dollars which puts him at the highest level of convicted robbery.
    That's a fair point, but we don't know if they are going to same jail. In fact, it looked like they were in a "snag" because of external factors (Zombie Apocalypse screwing everything up). They could have been from the same temp jail, and then they were going to separately transferred. We don't know.

    My point is, we don't know what extent Danny's crimes are. There's simply not enough even implied evidence. He could have done it, he might not have. There is definitive evidence unless Telltale decides to provide more of it. My point is, Telltale intentionally left those details out so it's open to interpretation.

    I'm not saying he's innocent, I'm saying we don't know if he's guilty for sure. We know Vince is guilty for sure. We know Justin is guilty for sure. We don't know if Danny is guilty for sure. He might be. He might not be. We don't know. And that's what Telltale intended.
  • edited July 2013
    Yes I did notice that, it probably won't be long before the moderators come.
  • edited July 2013


    Im offensive and I find this Jewish

    Really....so the fact that Justin said he had hundred of millions of dollars did not affect your choice of who to shoot then? XD LOL I REST MY CASE....on my balls, i rest my case on my balls and my balls have eyes
  • edited July 2013
    PotatoCat wrote: »
    you realise its mostly family guy quotes now?

    xd lulz
  • edited July 2013
    Really....so the fact that Justin said he had hundred of millions of dollars did not affect your choice of who to shoot then? XD LOL I REST MY CASE....on my balls, i rest my case on my balls and my balls have eyes

    I like this guy
    Yes I did notice that, it probably won't be long before the moderators come.

    Mods come in For what?
  • edited July 2013
    MsLox wrote: »
    I'm still loving the support for Danny cause I knew I wasn't the only one who agreed with their original gut feeling on saving him. If I recall, when I played 70% of the players had shot Justin.
    I didn't save him because I wanted Vince to join Tavia. :p
  • edited July 2013



    Mods come in For what?

    what do you think? THE POONE DAWG THE POON! TROLOLZ
  • edited July 2013
    what do you think? THE POONE DAWG THE POON! TROLOLZ
    If you are on meds, it time to get off them. If you are not on meds, it's time to get on them.
  • edited July 2013
    I didn't save him because I wanted Vince to join Tavia. :p

    Fuck that, Im not doing that just because of Tavia's offer of "settlement" my ass, we've dealt with Crawford, Woodbury, and Negan's Settlement in TWD, I dont trust settlements at all unless god damn Rick Grimes is running it. Id rather choose my option than having everyone join Tavia "because we have to get everyone join with her"
  • edited July 2013
    If you are on meds, it time to get off them. If you are not on meds, it's time to get on them.

    what? you know dem mods luv dat poone! lol why the hell you think they BECOME Mods dude? for the cooch nomsayin?
  • edited July 2013
    I didn't save him because I wanted Vince to join Tavia. :p

    And you knew this was the way to get Vince to join Tavia on your first playthrough? I'm talking gut feelings here, not rewinding.
  • edited July 2013
    Fuck that, Im not doing that just because of Tavia's offer of "settlement" my ass, we've dealt with Crawford, Woodbury, and Negan's Settlement in TWD, I dont trust settlements at all unless god damn Rick Grimes is running it. Id rather choose my option than having everyone join Tavia "because we have to get everyone join with her"
    Look, you know why I wanted to him join? Because I'm completiionist.

    But I'm going to honest here - you are correct. Do we actually want them to join Tavia? We don't know. I mean, Bonnie is too really dependent on others, especially emotionally. It's no wonder she joined.

    Russell didn't join because he is a really individualistic guy. Vince doesn't join because he's loyal to the original group (if you saved Danny).
  • edited July 2013
    MsLox wrote: »
    And you knew this was the way to get Vince to join Tavia on your first playthrough? I'm talking gut feelings here, not rewinding.

    Oh, I waited a couple of days for the news to come out on how to get people to join. :p
This discussion has been closed.