Why did people choose to kill **** because he was a rapist?
If season 1 taught us anything it's that in the apocalypse your past doesn't matter; it's who you are at the moment that counts.
Danny stood up to the guard in order to try and help the man being strangled, and Justin just sat there. Danny is more physically strong as well; I can literally not see a single reason why Justin should be chosen over him.
If it's because of his crime, then should Lee have been killed? Should Vince have been killed? Murder is considered a more serious crime than rape after all.
I'm not defending his crime, I'm just saying that killing him because of it is kind of silly in that context. I'm sure people had other reasons than that for killing him, and I would like to hear them
Danny stood up to the guard in order to try and help the man being strangled, and Justin just sat there. Danny is more physically strong as well; I can literally not see a single reason why Justin should be chosen over him.
If it's because of his crime, then should Lee have been killed? Should Vince have been killed? Murder is considered a more serious crime than rape after all.
I'm not defending his crime, I'm just saying that killing him because of it is kind of silly in that context. I'm sure people had other reasons than that for killing him, and I would like to hear them
This discussion has been closed.
Comments
Danny was clearly lying about commiting his crime; while Justin was a dick he was honest about everything he'd done.
Also Danny acted kind of dumb in my opinion - shouting at the walker for help and attracting attention.
Finally the main reason was that danny was the one who suggested the idea so thats the reason
Vince didn't accidentally kill.
Umm, didn't Justin admit to lying under oath in court?
lol wat
Well then that's fine, my question was directed at the numerous people who I've seen say that they killed Danny over Justin JUST because his crime was more serious. It seems like you killed him because it was his idea, which was reasonable.
While it could be argued in some cases that rape is AS bad as some forms of murder, I can't see how it could possibly be WORSE than killing a person.
I was just pointing out reasons why just basing the decision on the crime each has committed is a reasonable action. I didn't decide using that reasoning, but I can see why others would. Just gave my 2 cents on why I understand why people look at it that way.
Vince killed a man in cold blood; it was not a rage induced crime of passion.
You can't justify that.
Still, if the actually man is more useful than another, it makes more sense to save him regardless of what he did. He at least showed some form of regret in that bus, something Justin did not do.
Are you even listening to what you're saying? Lee killed for a reason.
No but he had a purpose to protect his brother,he's not a serial killer who gets a joy out of their crimes like Rapists do.
Lee was the kind of person who kills someone, as was Vince.
Murder with a purpose is still murder.
If no-one changes, then Vince is still someone who thinks murder is justifiable.
Murder can sometimes be for the right reasons,if someone shot Hitler in the head it would be murder but would be for the greater good. There is no black and white when it comes to murder but raping is clear cut black and white WRONG.
Sometimes it is.
So the man having an affair with Lee's wife was as bad as Hitler?
So the man causing problems for Vince's brother was as bad as Hitler?
Vince had no excuse, not even the excuse of temporary insanity that Lee had. He killed a man. Regardless of whether it was to protect his brother, there are other ways to go about it.
Oh ok, so you understood when Larry tried to kill Lee? Because that's the EXACT reasoning that Larry used.
So you weren't angry at Larry AT ALL for trying to leave Lee behind, correct?
Also, I assume you are going to kill Vince as soon is possible in season 2, because you wouldn't want a murderer with you in the apocalypse right? You won't want him to be of any danger to the season 2 characters right?
So Lee is a danger to the group? is that what you saying?
Don't be stupid of course I'm not comparing them to Hitler that was just a laboured example. The fact is Lee/Vince aren't going to kill again whereas Danny will most likely rape the next attractive Woman he meets.
i'm sure Vince won't kill too. They killed for a reason, Like Danny raped for no reason.
^ This. Danny Raped because he enjoys it like a drug,he will do it again. It's psychological.
I never said I didn't want murderers with me in the apocalypse. Look how Lee turned out, I'm sure Vince will be like him too.
I just didn't want Danny getting anywhere near Christa or Clem or anyone if they showed up in season 2. That was my first thought when making this choice.
Do you have any evidence to back that up?
We don't need evidence.
Depending on dialogue, choice, Vince doesn't regret it either.
The guy I was replying to didn't want Danny in his group because he was a rapist and killed him for it.
Larry didn't want Lee in his group because he was a murderer and tried to kill him for it.
That's right, it's a choise. He can even say "everyday"