I can even begin to talk about how much is wrong with that post, so I will spare you the details since you are not as bad as Ehkay, but I will say this, people did not save Carley just so they could get 'laid', I blame Pewdiepie for creating that thought.
I can even begin to talk about how much is wrong with that post, so I will spare you the details since you are not as bad as Ehkay, but I will say this, people did not save Carley just so they could get 'laid', I blame Pewdiepie for creating that thought.
That was just a joke
Feel free to point out how I'm 'wrong' for having a different opinion regarding Lilly and Kenny though I'll be waiting
try to finish these two sentences with an actual understandable and good reason:
1) i killed someone because....
2) i raped someone because....
personally i think number two is a lot harder to finish without sounding insane/evil, and that is why i think it is fair to judge people on their past actions
You just broke up the fight even more stalkinghead, well I guess I will go eat my popcorn in the dinning room, while still typing which makes so sense.
You just broke up the fight even more stalkinghead, well I guess I will go eat my popcorn in the dinning room, while still typing which makes so sense.
try to finish these two sentences with an actual understandable and good reason:
1) i killed someone because....
2) i raped someone because....
personally i think number two is a lot harder to finish without sounding insane/evil, and that is why i think it is fair to judge people on their past actions
OT, those two statements are non-sequiturs.
Your argument is basically, rape is harder to justify, therefore in a zombie apocalypse it's ok to judge all people on past actions.
The way I see it, zombie apocalypse or not, it's perfectly fine to judge people on their past actions, provided that you don't completely ignore their present actions while doing so.
The way I see it, zombie apocalypse or not, it's perfectly fine to judge people on their past actions, provided that you don't completely ignore their present actions while doing so.
Rape is as horrible a crime as murder IMO, and it's NOT kind of silly to make a decision based on his crime. If someone has done a horrible thing in the past, what's to stop them from doing it again? Rapists and murderers don't get to be instantly forgiven just because it's the apocalypse. That includes Lee and Vince. Picking a rapist to be in your group simply because "Oh, things are different now. What he did was in the past," seems silly. Just because Lee and Vince turned out well doesn't mean ALL criminals will. It's even heavily implied that Danny DIDN'T turn out as well as those two did by Russell on Day 400. Personally, I think both Danny and Justin are scum. I only shot Danny because it was his idea to basically blow somebody's foot off so the other two can escape, which means that he volunteered.
Rock, rape is nowhere NEAR murder. One is having forcible sex with someone (which is pretty bad), but murder is ending a human life. Murder is literally the worst thing you can do unless you murder a bunch of people. I'd rather be raped again and again, be forced to be a sex slave, and shipped overseas to a big dude who cuts me for fun than to be killed. Of course, being a dude, and a chubby one at that, that probably wouldn't happen. But anything is better than being killed. The only time I like murder is when you're put into the same situation as Jeffery Dahmer. He was killed in prison solely off of the basis of his crimes, where he murdered, raped, and then cut up his victims, put them in the fridge, and ate them over time, eventually feeding his next victim his last one.
Your argument is basically, rape is harder to justify, therefore in a zombie apocalypse it's ok to judge all people on past actions.
Also, murder isn't always a Vince situation, where he can explain it in a way that makes him sound good. Some people kill because someone looked at them funny.
Also, murder isn't always a Vince situation, where he can explain it in a way that makes him sound good. Some people kill because someone looked at them funny.
yeah, and it would be the justification i would mainly judge, obviously rape and murder are both bad things obviously, but there lots are reasons why killing somebody could be justified or understood (like what if that guy raped Vince's brother) but rape is just sadistic
So is murder, usually. Also, what if somebody raped someone while they were blackout drunk, and out of control? I'm not saying it's an excuse, but..
i am talking about killing someone, self defence isn't sadistic, saving someone else's life by killing another isn't sadistic, putting someone out of their misery isn't sadistic.
and well, raping someone while they were drunk would be taking advantage of someone which isn't justifiable or understandable
edit: if you mean the person doing the raping was drunk, the phrase "out of control" when talking about alcohol isn't literal, you can control that
Self defense isn't a crime. Putting someone out of their misery isn't a crime if they're on life support, and are a vegetable. I'm sure it wouldn't be with a bite.
I'd understand. They'd still be a little bit scummy, but they wouldn't be the assholes that rape people while sober are.
I'd understand. They'd still be a little bit scummy, but they wouldn't be the assholes that rape people while sober are.
I wouldn't understand, alcohol isn't some magical evil juice that relinquishes you of all control and makes you unaccountable for your actions, you just get drunk, raping someone while you are drunk is the same as doing it sober
I wouldn't understand, alcohol isn't some magical evil juice that relinquishes you of all control and makes you unaccountable for your actions, you just get drunk, raping someone while you are drunk is the same as doing it sober
Just because you are under the influence of a narcotic does not excuse you do to anything sexual to another person. No matter how "drunk" you or someone may be, you still know what you are doing.
There is no excuse, why is this even a question?
Lemme add a little more law spice to this discussion. Not sure how it is in other countries, but here, committing a crime under the influence of alcohol or drugs can actually worsen your punishment. It under no circumstances excuses a person of said crime, with the sole exception of when the said person was intoxicated against his will. THAT is the only time when you might be pardoned for your crime and the responsibility will go to the person who FORCIBLY made you drink/take drugs. For the record, peer pressure to drink more than you can handle is not considered forcible, by the way. You can always refuse :P
Comments
He didn't stick with ME in the meat locker, or with the car, or in the train, or in episodes 4 and 5 with the appalling way he treated Ben.
That was just a joke
Feel free to point out how I'm 'wrong' for having a different opinion regarding Lilly and Kenny though
Kenny was a brouche. Love him to bits, but I've got to be realistic.
.
.
.
*Decides to go with it*
LARRY WAS DEAD!!
What have you done DomeWing, WHAT HAVE YOU DONE *Explosion.*
Yeah its time for an internet fight!!!!!!!
Ask not for whom the bell tolls, it tolls for me!
How about...
WE WERE ON A BREAK!!!!
1) i killed someone because....
2) i raped someone because....
personally i think number two is a lot harder to finish without sounding insane/evil, and that is why i think it is fair to judge people on their past actions
Larry lifts bro, do you?
I've come too late.
OT, those two statements are non-sequiturs.
Your argument is basically, rape is harder to justify, therefore in a zombie apocalypse it's ok to judge all people on past actions.
yeah, i agree
But when I do I make him suffer
I try
Rock, rape is nowhere NEAR murder. One is having forcible sex with someone (which is pretty bad), but murder is ending a human life. Murder is literally the worst thing you can do unless you murder a bunch of people. I'd rather be raped again and again, be forced to be a sex slave, and shipped overseas to a big dude who cuts me for fun than to be killed. Of course, being a dude, and a chubby one at that, that probably wouldn't happen. But anything is better than being killed. The only time I like murder is when you're put into the same situation as Jeffery Dahmer. He was killed in prison solely off of the basis of his crimes, where he murdered, raped, and then cut up his victims, put them in the fridge, and ate them over time, eventually feeding his next victim his last one.
Also, murder isn't always a Vince situation, where he can explain it in a way that makes him sound good. Some people kill because someone looked at them funny.
I don't allways wake up early,
but when i do, i go to the forum.
yeah, and it would be the justification i would mainly judge, obviously rape and murder are both bad things obviously, but there lots are reasons why killing somebody could be justified or understood (like what if that guy raped Vince's brother) but rape is just sadistic
i am talking about killing someone, self defence isn't sadistic, saving someone else's life by killing another isn't sadistic, putting someone out of their misery isn't sadistic.
and well, raping someone while they were drunk would be taking advantage of someone which isn't justifiable or understandable
edit: if you mean the person doing the raping was drunk, the phrase "out of control" when talking about alcohol isn't literal, you can control that
I'd understand. They'd still be a little bit scummy, but they wouldn't be the assholes that rape people while sober are.
I wouldn't understand, alcohol isn't some magical evil juice that relinquishes you of all control and makes you unaccountable for your actions, you just get drunk, raping someone while you are drunk is the same as doing it sober
No it isn't and no it isn't.
i don't like you
Just because you are under the influence of a narcotic does not excuse you do to anything sexual to another person. No matter how "drunk" you or someone may be, you still know what you are doing.
There is no excuse, why is this even a question?