Firstly, people should stay away from the forum if they haven't played ep4, or any new episode, because you'll be spoiled one way or another… more. Secondly, there were far more spoiler-y titles (I'm pretty sure one said something like "Nick died") so I don't get why you feel like coming here, of all places, to bitch about this.
Finally, there's Rebecca, Sarah, Sarita, Jane and Bonnie (5 women, without counting Clementine, vs 3 men, if you don't count Nick for his determinant status). Everyone expects Rebecca and Sarita to die and Sarah's in a pretty shitty situation at the end of episode 3. All of them are in constant mortal danger and every episode has featured at least one character's death (all men until now). Can you explain to me why the hell would anyone not expect a woman to die or be shocked that a female character would kick the bucket this time? Seriously, this could be about Sarita or even a character introduced this episode, for all they know.
Just had to remove a couple posts regarding an argument about spoilers, and I thought I would point out that spoilers about the latest episode are fair game for discussion (as long as you use vague thread titles, which this thread does). As long as you flag your posts with the spoiler option and use vague thread titles which don't specifically imply something about only one character, you should be good to go.
A very valid point, but I fail to see how her death was meaningless. 1. It showed not everyone can be saved. 2. Sarah had just lost her protector. No matter what Clem did or could try and do, I do not believe she could replace what Carlos was. 3. She was not randomly killed off. her psyche was, more or less, shattered. If her death was "random" then every event in The Walking Dead is random as well.
I agree with that statement, but that doesn't mean their deaths have to be meaningless and arbitrary. Why did we teach her how to shoot, why… more did we befriend her, if she was just going to be randomly killed off, with a lot of untapped potential left over? If Ben had died in a forgettable way at the beginning of S1E5, not having stood up to Kenny, people would have rioted.
If you have some sort of an anxiety or dissociative disorder, which I believe she suffered from, you don't just get over that in a heartbeat. In fact, Carlos dying made it WAY worse. She's someone who crumbles in the face of tragedy or any sort of stress - Carlos himself said so to Clem. Even with Sarah saying "we should find my dad and go back to the cabin" or something to that effect, proves she can't face the reality of what's happening and she's trying to block it out.
To show that her father gave her a death sentence when he decided he'd coddle her forever. He had nearly two years to start teaching her...
… more
Pretty much what could have happened to Clem if it weren't for Chuck. I guess they were just trying to further prove his point.
I'm pretty upset by Sarah's death too because I really grew to care about her and felt sorry she was both sheltered by her dad and clearly had some sort of a mental disorder where she can't face stress or trauma. Honestly, without Carlos, she didn't stand a chance with her already fragile state of mind. Even Clem was barely getting through to her and they were friends. Sarah would never be able to pick up a gun - she couldn't even MOVE when the walkers were closing in, let alone suddenly have the courage to fight them.
I'm saddened that there wasn't any sort of real mourning for her (I mean did anyone really react much to Nick either?), but honestly...the group is clearly under a lot of stress. No food, the baby - I think they're at their limit.
I'm pretty mad about that...
Clementine's promise was for nothing....
Clementine having the option to teach Sarah how to shoot was for… more nothing...
Clementine could save her at the trailer park only to have a short conversation with her and she ends up dying...
Literally no one cared about what happened to Sarah after the baby was born...
Sarah really only played a part in Clementine's decisions and Jane's character development.
Sarah died by falling into a gigantic plot hole.
Seriously, no one jumps down to help Jane save her, no one shoots the walkers eating her… more, no one even thinks to shoot her so she doesn't have to suffer. I mean, why the hell was Sarah even out on the balcony anyways, rather than stay back with Rebecca? Out of character much?
I mourn the wasted potential that Clem and Sarah's relationship had, and how the build-up of it was essentially forgotten. Of all the characters demanding things of Clem and blaming her for her choices, Sarah was another kid who just wanted to be her friend. She was never meant to be the hardcore survivalist type, but she still could have supported and learned things from Clementine, while reminding her that life's value isn't merely in one's ability to fight like Jane.
There could have been the bittersweet theme of orphaned characters like Nick, Sarah, and Clem still finding reason to survive for the new family they've made together, but instead, their abrupt deaths just try to reinforce that the world is crap.
Definitely agree. Although I kinda wonder if maybe the story was supposed to go that way, but got cut for time. I mean, there was all this buildup, and that tweet about "being glad you taught her to shoot" (which can only mean that Sarah was originally supposed to save Clem somehow this episode, unless it was always just a huge troll). But here we are with only one episode left to go, and maybe they decided that with whatever they have planned for the big E5 drama (most likely something to do with the Russians) there just wasn't time for Sarah's redemption episode.
Which makes me sad, if that's true. Still, maybe we'll get that arc in S3. I think TTG might be winging it a bit too much, and need to plan ahead better. But then again, maybe I'm just wrong about this whole thing.
Yes, many of the characters' deaths have wasted potential. But death is always a waste of potential, and in an apocalypse story, sometimes that's the point. This season has been a bit of a rollercoaster, but I'm in no hurry to jump off the ride.
I mourn the wasted potential that Clem and Sarah's relationship had, and how the build-up of it was essentially forgotten. Of all the charac… moreters demanding things of Clem and blaming her for her choices, Sarah was another kid who just wanted to be her friend. She was never meant to be the hardcore survivalist type, but she still could have supported and learned things from Clementine, while reminding her that life's value isn't merely in one's ability to fight like Jane.
There could have been the bittersweet theme of orphaned characters like Nick, Sarah, and Clem still finding reason to survive for the new family they've made together, but instead, their abrupt deaths just try to reinforce that the world is crap.
I loved the episode in part to Sarahs death. Everyone was expecting her to survive (if you saved her in the first place.) Telltale has never shown gore/ violence for a kids death so it came out of no where to me. I think the only motivation behind it was that this is a dark game and you never know whats gonna happen. Period.
I see what you're saying, but as I said, I just feel there was a lot of untapped potential left in her character. Like Ben, she could have undergone some significant character development, with Clementine trying to lead her out of her state of panic and crisis, and her actually beginning to take steps towards being a survivor- if we had been a good friend to her, which should have been a prerequisite for saving her from the trailer park in the first place. And I'm just questioning what the purpose of our determinant friendship with her, and our determinant teaching her how to defend herself were, seeing as she was killed before either could come to fruition and make a real difference.
A very valid point, but I fail to see how her death was meaningless. 1. It showed not everyone can be saved. 2. Sarah had just lost her prot… moreector. No matter what Clem did or could try and do, I do not believe she could replace what Carlos was. 3. She was not randomly killed off. her psyche was, more or less, shattered. If her death was "random" then every event in The Walking Dead is random as well.
Obviously just my opinion.
If you have some sort of an anxiety or dissociative disorder, which I believe she suffered from, you don't just get over that in a heartbeat… more. In fact, Carlos dying made it WAY worse. She's someone who crumbles in the face of tragedy or any sort of stress - Carlos himself said so to Clem. Even with Sarah saying "we should find my dad and go back to the cabin" or something to that effect, proves she can't face the reality of what's happening and she's trying to block it out.
Fucking..I thought Clementine and Sarah would foreshadow Lee and Kenny. You have interesting characters and you open very controversial and great paths to them but the way you lead them is written very badly. PLEASE DO WHAT THE FANBASE WANTS NOT TO EXAGGERATION THE SAD EMOTION OF SOMEBODY DYING. FUCKING TRY SOMETHING DIFFERENT AND UNIQUE. KILLING CHARACTERS IS GETTING FUCKING OLD NOW. PLEASEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEE I AM TALKNIG TO MYSELF
I thought about it for a while. I think her death was really unnecessary. Truly it was because she had potential to head in some sort of meaningful direction. I am at a point where I don't want to like anyone anymore because they may just die.
I can agree with that. It would have been nice to see Sarah grow. To prove what Carlos had said to be false, "She would cease to function," that whole scene. Having a line that shows Sarah how strong she can be or how far she has come would have been beyond awesome. I have no doubt Telltale would have picked a perfect spot for such a scene.
But I still do not believe that's who Sarah character was meant to be. She wasn't going to have a dramatic turnaround, especially after being so closely sheltered by Carlos.
I see what you're saying, but as I said, I just feel there was a lot of untapped potential left in her character. Like Ben, she could have u… morendergone some significant character development, with Clementine trying to lead her out of her state of panic and crisis, and her actually beginning to take steps towards being a survivor- if we had been a good friend to her, which should have been a prerequisite for saving her from the trailer park in the first place. And I'm just questioning what the purpose of our determinant friendship with her, and our determinant teaching her how to defend herself were, seeing as she was killed before either could come to fruition and make a real difference.
I have mixed feelings about Sarah's death. Overall, I am deeply saddened by it. She was a great character and both versions of her death were one of the most gruesome and disturbing of the series. The way she gets overwhelmed by walkers and calls for Clem and her dad. It was gut-wrenching.
It would have been cool to see Sarah break out of her shell, learn skills from Clem and being a total badass by the end of the season. But I actually like that they didn't take this route with her. Like Jane said, not everyone can be saved, no matter how hard you may try. Also, not everyone is able to cope/adapt to this world. Sarah's death was to show both of these points. I kinda like that a lot of people had high hopes for Sarah (myself included), but in the end she was doomed.
That being said, I feel there was some lost potential with Sarah. I would have liked to see more of her coping with her father's death and with everything else that has happened. We got a tiny glimpse of her being in denial (saying that her dad would be back soon), and it would have been interesting to see that explored more.
Clem's reaction to Sarah's death also fell flat for me. I have two playthroughs, one that is my gut-reaction to stuff (where I'm bffs with Sarah), and one where I am a total asshole (where I'm mean to her). Clem and Sarah's interactions were exactly the same in both. It would have been nice to see our friendship with Sarah have a major affect on her death. Like she'd only come with us from the trailer if we pinky-sweared. Or if we're mean to her, but save her anyways, she questions us why. Just something.
I mean I pretty much assumed she did from the start (I studied a lot of psychology in college lol), but if you check her wiki page they allude in her description that she had some issues going on.
This is very true. Even though it sent a clear message, the lost potential you mentioned bothered me a bit. I don't think she had truly ceased to function, but we can never know for sure if she would've recovered or not.
I have mixed feelings about Sarah's death. Overall, I am deeply saddened by it. She was a great character and both versions of her death wer… moree one of the most gruesome and disturbing of the series. The way she gets overwhelmed by walkers and calls for Clem and her dad. It was gut-wrenching.
It would have been cool to see Sarah break out of her shell, learn skills from Clem and being a total badass by the end of the season. But I actually like that they didn't take this route with her. Like Jane said, not everyone can be saved, no matter how hard you may try. Also, not everyone is able to cope/adapt to this world. Sarah's death was to show both of these points. I kinda like that a lot of people had high hopes for Sarah (myself included), but in the end she was doomed.
That being said, I feel there was some lost potential with Sarah. I would have liked to see more of her coping with her father's death and with everything else that has happ… [view original content]
I'm pretty upset by Sarah's death too because I really grew to care about her and felt sorry she was both sheltered by her dad and clearly h… moread some sort of a mental disorder where she can't face stress or trauma. Honestly, without Carlos, she didn't stand a chance with her already fragile state of mind. Even Clem was barely getting through to her and they were friends. Sarah would never be able to pick up a gun - she couldn't even MOVE when the walkers were closing in, let alone suddenly have the courage to fight them.
I'm saddened that there wasn't any sort of real mourning for her (I mean did anyone really react much to Nick either?), but honestly...the group is clearly under a lot of stress. No food, the baby - I think they're at their limit.
I agree with all of that. Teaching Sarah to shoot seemed like a choice which would of made a difference but yet it did nothing. You would think that something would happen if you taught her that. She could of saved herself or saved another character, Instead nothing changes. Don't see the point in making these choices when they don't do a damn thing.
I'm pretty mad about that...
Clementine's promise was for nothing....
Clementine having the option to teach Sarah how to shoot was for… more nothing...
Clementine could save her at the trailer park only to have a short conversation with her and she ends up dying...
Literally no one cared about what happened to Sarah after the baby was born...
Sarah really only played a part in Clementine's decisions and Jane's character development.
Luke gives Clementine a gun if she fights off the Walkers on the Observation Deck with the others.... they should have at least showed Luke giving Sarah the gun if Clementine decided to stay and help Rebecca.
I agree with all of that. Teaching Sarah to shoot seemed like a choice which would of made a difference but yet it did nothing. You would th… moreink that something would happen if you taught her that. She could of saved herself or saved another character, Instead nothing changes. Don't see the point in making these choices when they don't do a damn thing.
some people are saying sarah had anxiety or a dissociative disorder, but i think it was more than that, i think she had some kind of learning disability, like she had the mental age of an 8 year old or something or perhaps autism, i think people were making up their own stories about sarah while ignoring everything in the actual game.
i'm not saying people with learning disabilities should die in circumstances like a zombie apocalypse, but people like sarah would always be a burden out on the road, i think she probably would have had a better chance of surviving if clementines group hadn't destroyed carvers camp, infact i think overthrowing the leadership of carver would have been a much better choice overall rather than destroying the camp, i actually think clementines group are murderers because of what they did to carvers group.
Season 2 has had its highlights and I still plan to see how it ends; I just don't think I have the same level of investment with what's left of the group. Most of the characters I had interest in abruptly died to clean up excess subplots, and it feels a bit hollow to hope that the same type of relationships will be rehashed with better development and a new cast in season 3. I mean, the set-ups were there, and they could have had the strength of building on them rather than dropping everything back to a nihilistic status quo, but sadly that wasn't the case.
Who knows? Maybe season 3 will be given a bit more time for development and effort, but I'm hesitant to raise my hopes up to the same degree.
Definitely agree. Although I kinda wonder if maybe the story was supposed to go that way, but got cut for time. I mean, there was all this… more buildup, and that tweet about "being glad you taught her to shoot" (which can only mean that Sarah was originally supposed to save Clem somehow this episode, unless it was always just a huge troll). But here we are with only one episode left to go, and maybe they decided that with whatever they have planned for the big E5 drama (most likely something to do with the Russians) there just wasn't time for Sarah's redemption episode.
Which makes me sad, if that's true. Still, maybe we'll get that arc in S3. I think TTG might be winging it a bit too much, and need to plan ahead better. But then again, maybe I'm just wrong about this whole thing.
Yes, many of the characters' deaths have wasted potential. But death is always a waste of potential, and in an apocalypse story, sometimes that's the point.… [view original content]
The thing is, if you save her at least, she doesn't die due to being coddled. She dies in a freak accident that was a result of luke not doi… moreng his job properly (I'm not hating, just saying) and even jane couldn't lift the stuff off her. So that doesn't really work.
She died because of the same reason why everyone else dies in the game. She had played part and the writers no longer needed her. I mean, I wish many of the characters who died in the previous episodes were still around but that's just kind of the way it is in TWD. It just wouldn't work like that, it sucks everytime but nothing we can do to change that. Sometimes the death of a character is necessary for the sake of the story advancement, though I know some were pretty uncalled for. But I have to admit, I always knew Sarah was going to die, it was so obvious from the begining. In Ep4, Sarah was there to test your moral compass, are you willing to leave someone to their fate or do whatever you can to save them, even if that puts own your life (and others) at risk? Same goes for the choice of pulling Jane up or convince her to help Sarah. I did try to help her though I was pretty sure that she wasn't going to survive the episode.
If you're willing to fully type-out words like "masterpiece" and "metaphor", there really is no excuse for the childish use of "u" and "ur".
Seriously, why?
And I'm not saying you wanted her to die, I'm saying that no person is totally without hope and beyond redemption. And even if some people were, that person sure isn't sarah. Just because you saw a scared, sheltered little girl doesn't mean she wasn't capable of becoming anything else. We saw her change a little bit when you saved her from the trailer, the fact that she got up after initially resigning herself to death proves that she was capable of fighting against her despair. She just had to learn about the world, due to having been sheltered, then she could grow and become stronger as a person. She needed some good talks, some guidance and a little time to overcome the shock of what had happened. She wasn't a case without hope.
Comments
Nice use of ad hominem.
And I seriously don't understand what the hell you're talking about. How am I selfish?
It's no use arguing with him. He's a troll.
Just had to remove a couple posts regarding an argument about spoilers, and I thought I would point out that spoilers about the latest episode are fair game for discussion (as long as you use vague thread titles, which this thread does). As long as you flag your posts with the spoiler option and use vague thread titles which don't specifically imply something about only one character, you should be good to go.
She died because Clem left her to die. Atleast in my playtrough it was a choice
A very valid point, but I fail to see how her death was meaningless. 1. It showed not everyone can be saved. 2. Sarah had just lost her protector. No matter what Clem did or could try and do, I do not believe she could replace what Carlos was. 3. She was not randomly killed off. her psyche was, more or less, shattered. If her death was "random" then every event in The Walking Dead is random as well.
Obviously just my opinion.
Said the Larry fan. Not a surprise.
If you have some sort of an anxiety or dissociative disorder, which I believe she suffered from, you don't just get over that in a heartbeat. In fact, Carlos dying made it WAY worse. She's someone who crumbles in the face of tragedy or any sort of stress - Carlos himself said so to Clem. Even with Sarah saying "we should find my dad and go back to the cabin" or something to that effect, proves she can't face the reality of what's happening and she's trying to block it out.
Yeah, it was terrible idea to shelter her like Carlos did.
I'm pretty upset by Sarah's death too because I really grew to care about her and felt sorry she was both sheltered by her dad and clearly had some sort of a mental disorder where she can't face stress or trauma. Honestly, without Carlos, she didn't stand a chance with her already fragile state of mind. Even Clem was barely getting through to her and they were friends. Sarah would never be able to pick up a gun - she couldn't even MOVE when the walkers were closing in, let alone suddenly have the courage to fight them.
I'm saddened that there wasn't any sort of real mourning for her (I mean did anyone really react much to Nick either?), but honestly...the group is clearly under a lot of stress. No food, the baby - I think they're at their limit.
Yeah she was just watching the walkers instead of helping.
I mourn the wasted potential that Clem and Sarah's relationship had, and how the build-up of it was essentially forgotten. Of all the characters demanding things of Clem and blaming her for her choices, Sarah was another kid who just wanted to be her friend. She was never meant to be the hardcore survivalist type, but she still could have supported and learned things from Clementine, while reminding her that life's value isn't merely in one's ability to fight like Jane.
There could have been the bittersweet theme of orphaned characters like Nick, Sarah, and Clem still finding reason to survive for the new family they've made together, but instead, their abrupt deaths just try to reinforce that the world is crap.
Definitely agree. Although I kinda wonder if maybe the story was supposed to go that way, but got cut for time. I mean, there was all this buildup, and that tweet about "being glad you taught her to shoot" (which can only mean that Sarah was originally supposed to save Clem somehow this episode, unless it was always just a huge troll). But here we are with only one episode left to go, and maybe they decided that with whatever they have planned for the big E5 drama (most likely something to do with the Russians) there just wasn't time for Sarah's redemption episode.
Which makes me sad, if that's true. Still, maybe we'll get that arc in S3. I think TTG might be winging it a bit too much, and need to plan ahead better. But then again, maybe I'm just wrong about this whole thing.
Yes, many of the characters' deaths have wasted potential. But death is always a waste of potential, and in an apocalypse story, sometimes that's the point. This season has been a bit of a rollercoaster, but I'm in no hurry to jump off the ride.
I loved the episode in part to Sarahs death. Everyone was expecting her to survive (if you saved her in the first place.) Telltale has never shown gore/ violence for a kids death so it came out of no where to me. I think the only motivation behind it was that this is a dark game and you never know whats gonna happen. Period.
To prove the point that not everyone can be saved.
Teach them as much as you like, Clementine is not the norm. Sarah was not apt to living in this world.
I see what you're saying, but as I said, I just feel there was a lot of untapped potential left in her character. Like Ben, she could have undergone some significant character development, with Clementine trying to lead her out of her state of panic and crisis, and her actually beginning to take steps towards being a survivor- if we had been a good friend to her, which should have been a prerequisite for saving her from the trailer park in the first place. And I'm just questioning what the purpose of our determinant friendship with her, and our determinant teaching her how to defend herself were, seeing as she was killed before either could come to fruition and make a real difference.
I dont know if she has a mental disorder, but if she does than I have nothing to say, your argument is better
Fucking..I thought Clementine and Sarah would foreshadow Lee and Kenny. You have interesting characters and you open very controversial and great paths to them but the way you lead them is written very badly. PLEASE DO WHAT THE FANBASE WANTS NOT TO EXAGGERATION THE SAD EMOTION OF SOMEBODY DYING. FUCKING TRY SOMETHING DIFFERENT AND UNIQUE. KILLING CHARACTERS IS GETTING FUCKING OLD NOW. PLEASEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEE I AM TALKNIG TO MYSELF
I'm not saying I wanted her to die, all I'm saying is: She was going to.
I thought about it for a while. I think her death was really unnecessary. Truly it was because she had potential to head in some sort of meaningful direction. I am at a point where I don't want to like anyone anymore because they may just die.
I can agree with that. It would have been nice to see Sarah grow. To prove what Carlos had said to be false, "She would cease to function," that whole scene. Having a line that shows Sarah how strong she can be or how far she has come would have been beyond awesome. I have no doubt Telltale would have picked a perfect spot for such a scene.
But I still do not believe that's who Sarah character was meant to be. She wasn't going to have a dramatic turnaround, especially after being so closely sheltered by Carlos.
I have mixed feelings about Sarah's death. Overall, I am deeply saddened by it. She was a great character and both versions of her death were one of the most gruesome and disturbing of the series. The way she gets overwhelmed by walkers and calls for Clem and her dad. It was gut-wrenching.
It would have been cool to see Sarah break out of her shell, learn skills from Clem and being a total badass by the end of the season. But I actually like that they didn't take this route with her. Like Jane said, not everyone can be saved, no matter how hard you may try. Also, not everyone is able to cope/adapt to this world. Sarah's death was to show both of these points. I kinda like that a lot of people had high hopes for Sarah (myself included), but in the end she was doomed.
That being said, I feel there was some lost potential with Sarah. I would have liked to see more of her coping with her father's death and with everything else that has happened. We got a tiny glimpse of her being in denial (saying that her dad would be back soon), and it would have been interesting to see that explored more.
Clem's reaction to Sarah's death also fell flat for me. I have two playthroughs, one that is my gut-reaction to stuff (where I'm bffs with Sarah), and one where I am a total asshole (where I'm mean to her). Clem and Sarah's interactions were exactly the same in both. It would have been nice to see our friendship with Sarah have a major affect on her death. Like she'd only come with us from the trailer if we pinky-sweared. Or if we're mean to her, but save her anyways, she questions us why. Just something.
I mean I pretty much assumed she did from the start (I studied a lot of psychology in college lol), but if you check her wiki page they allude in her description that she had some issues going on.
This is very true. Even though it sent a clear message, the lost potential you mentioned bothered me a bit. I don't think she had truly ceased to function, but we can never know for sure if she would've recovered or not.
She had anxiety, I guess when you relate to a character you can't help but like them xd
Their is no more choice in s1 then 2. It's all one big lie. The game said choices cater to the story but they really don't
I agree with all of that. Teaching Sarah to shoot seemed like a choice which would of made a difference but yet it did nothing. You would think that something would happen if you taught her that. She could of saved herself or saved another character, Instead nothing changes. Don't see the point in making these choices when they don't do a damn thing.
Luke gives Clementine a gun if she fights off the Walkers on the Observation Deck with the others.... they should have at least showed Luke giving Sarah the gun if Clementine decided to stay and help Rebecca.
some people are saying sarah had anxiety or a dissociative disorder, but i think it was more than that, i think she had some kind of learning disability, like she had the mental age of an 8 year old or something or perhaps autism, i think people were making up their own stories about sarah while ignoring everything in the actual game.
i'm not saying people with learning disabilities should die in circumstances like a zombie apocalypse, but people like sarah would always be a burden out on the road, i think she probably would have had a better chance of surviving if clementines group hadn't destroyed carvers camp, infact i think overthrowing the leadership of carver would have been a much better choice overall rather than destroying the camp, i actually think clementines group are murderers because of what they did to carvers group.
She had chance to develop. She had potential.
She had that tragically taken away.
I think it's more a metaphor than anything.
Season 2 has had its highlights and I still plan to see how it ends; I just don't think I have the same level of investment with what's left of the group. Most of the characters I had interest in abruptly died to clean up excess subplots, and it feels a bit hollow to hope that the same type of relationships will be rehashed with better development and a new cast in season 3. I mean, the set-ups were there, and they could have had the strength of building on them rather than dropping everything back to a nihilistic status quo, but sadly that wasn't the case.
Who knows? Maybe season 3 will be given a bit more time for development and effort, but I'm hesitant to raise my hopes up to the same degree.
She cried for help because she was being devoured by Walkers. I think she was in massive pain.
so true
It's your decision.
REALLY???
Nah
Luke's fault? Really? I guess we have a hater here.
She died because of the same reason why everyone else dies in the game. She had played part and the writers no longer needed her. I mean, I wish many of the characters who died in the previous episodes were still around but that's just kind of the way it is in TWD. It just wouldn't work like that, it sucks everytime but nothing we can do to change that. Sometimes the death of a character is necessary for the sake of the story advancement, though I know some were pretty uncalled for. But I have to admit, I always knew Sarah was going to die, it was so obvious from the begining. In Ep4, Sarah was there to test your moral compass, are you willing to leave someone to their fate or do whatever you can to save them, even if that puts own your life (and others) at risk? Same goes for the choice of pulling Jane up or convince her to help Sarah. I did try to help her though I was pretty sure that she wasn't going to survive the episode.
I dont get it. Why i get dislikes for everything what i writing. Srsly? Just because i write "u"? Jesus are U fucking kidding me?
Heh, if you want to use slang I see on Facebook and in texts everyday, I say go for it. Don't let the dislikes get ya down.
The only message is that telltale hires bad writers.
I got the feeling it was before they started eating her.
And I'm not saying you wanted her to die, I'm saying that no person is totally without hope and beyond redemption. And even if some people were, that person sure isn't sarah. Just because you saw a scared, sheltered little girl doesn't mean she wasn't capable of becoming anything else. We saw her change a little bit when you saved her from the trailer, the fact that she got up after initially resigning herself to death proves that she was capable of fighting against her despair. She just had to learn about the world, due to having been sheltered, then she could grow and become stronger as a person. She needed some good talks, some guidance and a little time to overcome the shock of what had happened. She wasn't a case without hope.