Garfield+Telltale=Awsome?

edited November 2009 in General Chat
I was recently thinking how awsome it would be if Telltale and Paws Inc. created a Garfield game in 5 episodes! It just boggles the mind thinking how great this would be! Post down suggestions on what you would want to be seen in the game or just plain say how you feel about this from ever happining!
«1

Comments

  • edited June 2009
    I loved Garfield when I was a little kid. However over the past 20 years the comics have become rather awful and unfunny. I think the last funny edition was 25; they're on 50 or so I believe now. If it was done, I would hope Telltale wrote most of it.

    Could be good but more likely just a cash-in by Paws Inc. Don't even think Jim works on it anymore really.

    Although Garfield Minus Garfield could be great.
  • edited June 2009
    I'd want it based on the cartoon series, which was actually way funnier than the comic was. Especially since it added the "and friends" segments.
  • edited June 2009
    yeah, that cartoon was AWESOME.
  • edited June 2009
    I'd want it based on the cartoon series, which was actually way funnier than the comic was. Especially since it added the "and friends" segments.
    Good call!
  • edited June 2009
    too bad lorenzo music is dead. best garfield ever.
  • edited June 2009
    Bill Murray played Garfield. I wonder if he'd be in Telltale's price range. :D

    (yeah right)
  • JakeJake Telltale Alumni
    edited June 2009
    (Garfield - Garfield) + Telltale = Awesome
  • edited June 2009
    Jake wrote: »
    (Garfield - Garfield) + Telltale = Awesome
    I can't wait to solve complex algebra puzzles.
  • edited June 2009
    Jake wrote: »
    (Garfield - Garfield) + Telltale = Awesome

    This.

    Also, my favorite post-internet-hate-machine Garfield strip:

    garfield%20go%20back%20to%20bed.jpg
  • edited June 2009
    I'm a huge fan of comics ("sequential art"?, "graphic novels"?... whatever term serves best)... but Garfield leaves me really unimpressed.

    My favorite humorous comic strips are probably Calvin & Hobbes by Watterson and the Peanuts by Schulz (rip). That's some genius! :)
    (And I can think a tons more before Garfield...)


    Oh. Also that Purcell guy ain't bad at all :D:D:p:p
    (I don't think Sam & Max stories are qualifiable as "strips" anyway.)
  • edited June 2009
    Bill Murray played Garfield. I wonder if he'd be in Telltale's price range. :D

    (yeah right)

    Why not? Aside from Garfield he's had one film in the last 10 years that was critically acclaimed but that didn't make people want to watch it.

    But his price will be going up in the next few years, what with the new Ghostbusters game and Ghostbusters 3 coming out in just a few years.

    Does anybody else find it ironic that Bill Murray voiced Garfield, who was voiced by Lorenzo Music in what I suspect was the longest running Garfield cartoon; 'Garfield and Friends' and was also the voice of Dr. Peter Venkman on the cartoon of Ghostbusters (which, ofc, was Murray's role)

    As voice actors go I think Bill Murray might be a cheap alternative to Tom Hanks, who would presumably cost much more at the moment)... Whenever I try to think of the voice of Bill Murray all I can imagine is the voice of Tom Hanks anyway.
  • edited June 2009
    Marduk wrote: »
    Does anybody else find it ironic that Bill Murray voiced Garfield, who was voiced by Lorenzo Music in what I suspect was the longest running Garfield cartoon; 'Garfield and Friends' and was also the voice of Dr. Peter Venkman on the cartoon of Ghostbusters (which, ofc, was Murray's role)

    Not really ironic, but it is a loop that always fascinated me. I would actually be pretty surprised if the Lorenzo Music connection wasn't a big part of the inspiration for casting Bill Murray as Garfield later.
  • edited June 2009
    GozzoMan wrote: »
    I'm a huge fan of comics ("sequential art"?, "graphic novels"?... whatever term serves best)... but Garfield leaves me really unimpressed.

    My favorite humorous comic strips are probably Calvin & Hobbes by Watterson and the Peanuts by Schulz (rip). That's some genius! :)
    (And I can think a tons more before Garfield...)


    Oh. Also that Purcell guy ain't bad at all :D:D:p:p
    (I don't think Sam & Max stories are qualifiable as "strips" anyway.)

    Aye. I like this suggestion much better.

    To rip off Jake, (Calvin + Hobbes - Garfield) + Telltale = Awesome.
  • edited June 2009
    Bill Watterson would never go for it.
  • edited June 2009
    Watterson has always had it as his policy to keep Calvin and Hobbes a comic, and a comic only. Which I think is great, though. It's definitely what I want to remember it as.

    About Telltale making games based on comic books... Has anyone here read "Spirou"?
  • edited June 2009
    Your math(s) is impeccable, sir. :)

    I think Bill Murray is effectively just a mercenary (just my conclusions) but often they're the most expensive :<
  • edited June 2009
    Gryffalio wrote: »
    I think Bill Murray is effectively just a mercenary (just my conclusions) but often they're the most expensive :<

    Nay! Bill Murray is not a mercenary, he is a god. (Well, maybe not, but if somebody asks if you're a god...)
  • edited June 2009
    GozzoMan wrote: »
    ...but Garfield leaves me really unimpressed.

    My favourite humorous comic strips are probably Calvin & Hobbes by Watterson and the Peanuts by Schulz (rip). That's some genius!...


    I can understand a lot of you guys not finding Garfield funny. I found it funny as a young child but that was it. Sometimes I'll take a gander at it, though I rarely get a chuckle out of it.

    But I have never understood the following 'Peanuts' always seems to have had. Not one strip has ever made me laugh.

    As for Calvin and Hobbes... Well, I don't think I'm in a position to comment.
  • edited June 2009
    coughcoughcoughFARSIDEcoughcoughcough
  • edited June 2009
    Another series I think would work great from comic to game medium would be the Boondocks. Heck, it's already had a TV series, and there's a lot of character to work with there. However, it's also a very mature show; moreso than anything TT has done yet, even more so than Sam and Max. But I doubt they wouldn't be up to the task. EDIT: No it's not a racist comic; it's written by a black man; it's a cultural parody with some of the best characters ever.

    boondocks-posters.jpg

    Best. Comic. Ever.
  • edited June 2009
    Marduk wrote: »
    But I have never understood the following 'Peanuts' always seems to have had. Not one strip has ever made me laugh.

    It's honestly not really a "laugh" comic. It's more of a "charm" comic.
  • edited June 2009
    LuigiHann wrote: »
    It's honestly not really a "laugh" comic. It's more of a "charm" comic.

    Actually I laughed a lot when I read them as a child, but nowadays as an adult things have become different. I´d rater have Dilbert nowadays hehe...
  • edited June 2009
    Duh, I wasn't really suggesting C&H or Peanuts for a game... I was just talking about strips. :o

    But now that you people mentioned it... In fact it seems far more feasible to me a Peanuts game, than a C&H... even if I would love a C&H game if someone can come up with a proper concept! I would like very much a Peanuts game, of course. Snoopy in its diverse imaginary characters should be playable :D

    As for Watterson, wait a moment: I remember from "10 Years of C&H" that he was very strongly against merchandise of C&H... but would he be against a translation in other narrative media if he'd have creative control or at least veto? TTG showed to care very much for it.

    Did Watterson mention to be against an animation series of C&H for example? I don't remember. If he did, was it a creative control issue or rather an "factual impossibility to properly render the characters in a single illustration on mug or something like that" issue as was for merchandise?

    Those seem to be rather different issues to me.

    ShaggE wrote: »
    Nay! Bill Murray is not a mercenary, he is a god. (Well, maybe not, but if somebody asks if you're a god...)

    ROTFL!! :D:D

    Ghostbusters for the Wii is being delayed in Europe to late 2009 by those s*ckers at Sony EU, which had the distribution from Atari, while PS2 and PS3 versions are available :mad:
  • edited June 2009
    LuigiHann wrote: »
    It's honestly not really a "laugh" comic. It's more of a "charm" comic.

    I have also laughed many times... but, yes, I agree with your interesting definition :)
  • edited June 2009
    OMG, this reminds me of this game I dreamed about a long time ago! :D

    Yes, I dreamed to play it, and it seemed to be very funny :p

    In short, it was similar to Lost Vikings: a puzzle platformer, in which you have to coordinate and switch taking control between characters with different specific abilities... but in my dream the game was based on... The Smurfs! A dozen of them available for each level, with abilities derived by the personality we've seen in the animated series... (comics have less distinctive characters).

    For an adventure game, it would be some kind of Maniac Mansion/DOTT (or Zak while on Mars)... on a much greater scale! :D


    Hey, I can't control my dreams... If I could, it would have been "Scantly-clad Lost Vikingesses!" starring Ms. Jolie, Ms. Jovovic and Ms. Knightley... Oh, yes :D
  • edited June 2009
    I've never really been into newspaper comic strips though I do love comics. I did suggest Neil Gaiman's "Sandman" in another stip months ago and its spinoff "Lucifer", both of which would no doubt be drama and relished mostly for the beauty of their art work if ever mad into games.

    But I used to quite like 'Dilbert'. I think that might make a better adventure than Garfield, the main problem being that Dilbert seldom has 'adventures', or do anything very exciting.

    I did quite enjoy 'Nemi', but they stopped printing it in the UK and I wasn't able to find any english translations online. (Actually it's been years since I even looked, I might take another search later on.
  • edited July 2009
    werpu wrote: »
    Actually I laughed a lot when I read them as a child, but nowadays as an adult things have become different. I´d rater have Dilbert nowadays hehe...

    I loved the Dilbert cartoon series. :D
  • edited July 2009
    leon101 wrote: »
    I loved the Dilbert cartoon series. :D
    There was a cartoon?
  • edited July 2009
    I'd really want to see Garfield in a point-and-click. Whenever TellTale has the time and money, they should start working on this.
  • edited July 2009
    Marduk wrote: »
    There was a cartoon?

    I think it only got 1 or two series, but yes there was.
    I felt it was actually a lot better than the strips, as the half-hour episodes meant that there was a lot more time to flesh out the characters and plots than on a gag-a-day strip.

    The whole "Todd" episode was definitely my favourite. There's so much subtle social commentary in there I can't believe they'd dare put it out without offending people.
    Maybe it's okay to make sweeping religious and political statements if you have talking animals an keep punning badly..?
  • edited July 2009
    Actually, and I can't believe I forgot about this till now, there was quite a great freeware Garfield point and click adventure game made, called Garfield: Attack of the Mutant Lasagna. As far as I remember the humor was spot on, and the graphics were not too bad for the most part; not to mention great puzzles. But the game was shut down by the creator in a near-lawsuit even though it was freeware and not being sold. In fact the nature of the lawsuit made me seriously lose respect for the author, who just wanted to wrench money out of a fan just trying to bring Garfield to a fun medium. You can still find the game if you search for it.

    http://www.mobygames.com/game/windows/garfield-attack-of-the-mutant-lasagna
  • edited July 2009
    It looks like Garfield is staring right into my soul...it's disturbing o_o
  • edited July 2009
    Garfield, the original LOLCAT!
  • edited July 2009
    Amen to that, brutha!
  • edited July 2009
    I have to agree with Jake's idea of a Garfield Minus Garfield Telltale game.

    "I can't use the shattered pieces of my life with that."

    "I can't pick that up. What's the point anyway?"

    Can't be that hard to license, right?
  • edited July 2009
    yes Garfield minus Garfield :)

    Farside: the adventure game
  • edited July 2009
    You know, when I first saw the title to this thread I was a bit skeptical.

    However, after thinking about it every so often... it's not such a bad idea.

    As far as the Garfield comic strips go, on the whole some strips are better than others. But Telltale have the right kind of humour for cartoon-based games (just look at Sam and Max!) and would use the characters to their potential and fill the games with comedy.

    I also think Garfield is one of the few newspaper strips that would work as an episodic game series.

    My favourite newspaper strip is and will always be Peanuts, but Charles Schulz left it in his will that he doesn't want anyone continuing the strip in any way that could alter the characters or anything, so basically it will never happen.
  • edited July 2009
    If they ever did a Garfield game, I'd want them to find their own voice for Garfield. The stand-in they have now post Lorenzo Music is....not good and I don't mean Bill Murray. They recently did a new cartoon special and the guy who did Garfield was the slow sheep from the old series.
  • edited July 2009
    What would a Garfield game be about, anyway? I mean, you'd have opportunities to comment on Mondays and kick Odie, and that pretty much covers everything that's come from Garfield from the last several years.

    Calvin and Hobbes, on the other hand, would be awesome. Not only could you incorporate some wild pranks and trouble-making, but you could also go into daydream mode, and suddenly be chasing down dinosaurs or launching into space. Not to mention all the crazy snowmen! (sigh) Now I want it.
Sign in to comment in this discussion.