That's it! I'm done with EA!

edited September 2011 in General Chat
I'll keep this brief.

I was banned from posting in The Sims 3 forums because I criticized their developers over what happened a few days ago when their Demo corrupted saved data from the main base game.

In my appeal, I discovered that the ban was because the developers didn't like my comment. That's right, I was banned for criticizing the developers. I even asked about the other people out there who did the exact same thing I did, only using harsher language. They got banned as well.

So, yeah, I can't post information or help other users out by pointing them to a bug report thread because I'm banned for criticizing their developers.

I seriously doubt TTG--any other developer for that matter--would do that.

EDIT: Oh, now this is just great. I now discovered that my ban isn't limited to The Sims 3. It's the entire EA library. My log-in cannot access my accounts on Spore.com or even the EA Store itself. I can only access their Customer Service area with no restrictions. Everywhere else, I'm been banned from even looking at the site as a member/user!

That's... urgh...
«1

Comments

  • edited September 2011
    I gave up on EA when Spore came around, not because the game was bad, (it was just mediocre) but because of that whole SecuROM nonsense. Would have given up on them sooner had I known Sims 2 incorporated SecuROM on later expansions. Pain in the butt to get that off my computer. B|

    Though your experience does sound pretty crappy as well. "Valid criticism? OH NO WE ARE DEFEATED."
  • edited September 2011
    Wow if EA did that then they suck i wonder do they know that by people saying stuff that's wrong with a game means they are meant to take care of the bugs and stuff to make there next game better but they just go and ban people.
  • edited September 2011
    PecanBlue wrote: »
    I gave up on EA when Spore came around, not because the game was bad, (it was just mediocre) but because of that whole SecuROM nonsense. Would have given up on them sooner had I known Sims 2 incorporated SecuROM on later expansions. Pain in the butt to get that off my computer. B|
    Well, EA learned their lesson from that when Spore won the title of "Most Pirated Game in History." After that, they released a program that would remove SecuROM from the computer.

    But that made world news. I doubt my banning because I criticized their developers for releasing a buggy demo will make a dent at all.
  • edited September 2011
    Well even if it's not SecuROM anymore, I don't really think they've learned their lesson.

    But perhaps I am out of the loop since I have not touched an EA game in a while. I started up Sims 3 for a bit but several things about it when compared to 2 were turning me off, and then I saw their "pay for exclusive items" thing and that's when I went full-on "screw you, EA".
  • edited September 2011
    Oh, it's worse than that. Just before the SNAFU that happened recently, EA released several buggy "Exclusive Pay Items." If you had those items by themselves, they would work fine. But if you had any more that were in the same category or accessed a similar line of code in the core programming files, you'd get compatibility issues out the ying-yang. And according to the DLC Terms, EA is under no obligation to fix the issue.

    Then again, there's a compatibility bug with their physical game copies that hasn't been fixed since it was found. It just turned 2 years old this month.
  • edited September 2011
    EA is good to their sports game users. They constantly update and patch. That being said, I've heard A LOT of people swearing them off because of Sims 3 incidents. Myself, being in the prior, have had no problems with them; seems they play favorites with games. :/
  • edited September 2011
    I enjoyed their early Harry Potter games (1 and 2). Completely untrue to the books/movies in both plot and character development...and architecture...and spellcasting...but boy were they fun. Just goes to show that a game doesn't need to make sense to be perfectly enjoyable.

    Though I will say that I completely gave up on the stealth section on the second game and just ran for it. Still worked.
  • edited September 2011
    Johro wrote: »
    EA is good to their sports game users. They constantly update and patch. That being said, I've heard A LOT of people swearing them off because of Sims 3 incidents. Myself, being in the prior, have had no problems with them; seems they play favorites with games. :/

    I've been noticing that as well. They seem to favor their big console titles, like their Sports division as you've pointed out, over the other titles they have in their library. It makes me wonder why they even have those titles, since it is clear all their money is going into other projects that are almost always going to bring them in positively reviewed products.

    I mean, wouldn't it make more sense to do that instead of having a bunch of people on one project and then a bare-bones team that can't produce the same high quality product because they are so limited on the other?
  • edited September 2011
    Updated my first post with some more, disturbing news.:(
  • edited September 2011
    Zeek wrote: »
    Updated my first post with some more, disturbing news.:(

    guess the thread title is truer than you intended
  • edited September 2011
    Yeah. Spore was my oasis in this whole mess because I loved the creature editor and how powerful it is. I loved pushing it to its limits or check out other players creations in it. I found out about this extension on my ban when I attempted to boot Spore just now and it said that it couldn't find the e-mail associated to my account. I checked the website and sure enough, I got the "you are banned" message when I attempted to log in. :(

    I guess I'll go back to RollerCoaster Tycoon 3 for my creative game fixes, since I can't run "From Dust" on my PC.
  • edited September 2011
    Now if you do want to take this further, I suggest a letter writing or Twitter campaign. Nothing starts an apology faster than a PR nightmare. I got booted off the Sims and Spore, as well, and I don't even use their forums. Spore stopped working for me earlier this year, and Sims 3 messed up my Mac.
  • edited September 2011
    You might need some screens to make an impact. If it's too late because the topic where you criticized them was removed, you can get someone else to sock puppet for you some similar critique and see if they get banned.

    I can do it since I haven't used my EA account in years. Let me know what you decide to do.
  • edited September 2011
    I'm not one to start a PR nightmare, be it on twitter or in a letter writing campaign.

    Even if I was that type, the evidence I have is only a transcript with their Customer Service rep. And their CS team has a nasty reputation of not knowing what they are talking about. In fact, this past summer, they got in trouble for generating too many coupons for xx% off Origins purchases as a way to address customer issues.

    But that transcript does say the following:
    Me: So let me see if I'm understanding this correctly. You're saying that I can go on the forums all I want and say that the EA programmers don't know what they are doing, lazy, don't bug test their products, etc. and not get banned for those comments. But saying "They're all a bunch of idiots anyays..." is a bannable offence?
    Me: Can you please explain what Rule of Conduct in the Terms of Service that falls under?

    Smarika: Friend this is the decision of game developers that they don't want even these sentences on forums so you are banned/

    Me: So they will allow comments about how players feel how poorly a game has been developed, sometimes using some harsh language, and not get banned for it. Meanwhile a statement I made in a similar context is okay to ban?

    Smarika: I apologize but you are not allowed to post on forums like this for developers.

    Me: People have been posting like that since the other day when the Create-a-Pets demo was released, calling the developers lazy, among other things. Yet they were not banned. I still don't understand why my comment was flagged as a Terms of Service violation if that kind of conduct was happening and not being policed a few days ago when it was at its peak.

    Smarika: Even they are banned also.

    Me: So what you are saying is that I'm not allowed to criticize the developers. Is that correct?

    Smarika: That developers wan.
    Smarika: wan
    Smarika: want

    Me: But if I criticize the developers, there's a chance I'll get banned because they don't want to see those comments on the forums. Correct?

    Smarika: That's their decision to take action.

    That right there pretty much confirms that if you criticize the developers and they don't like it, there's a chance they can ban you for it.
  • edited September 2011
    I don't understand EA in the lease..I would take a hard look under their EULA and Their Forum Guidelines. I think the restriction of your game library is a tad too far. IMHO.

    Even if you are banned on the forums here you still have access to your games.
  • edited September 2011
    Their EULA is one of those "all or nothing" agreements from what I read yesterday. Over and over again, the TOS stated that EA has the right to do this and that. And their wording suggests that it doesn't matter if you broke a rule on Spore, The Sims, or Battlefield side of the site. If you have an account with EA that they can ban, it will affect all the games you play with that account.

    And since they merged all those account into one prior to Origins release... Yeah.

    Interesting thing I did find in the EULA as far as your online account goes: EA also has the right to delete your account and not tell you why. They do state that there's a 2 year window of inactivity to warrant an auto-delete, but between now and when that 2 year inactivity starts? They can kill your account and not tell you why.
  • edited September 2011
    Didn't this happen on the Bioware forums? People were criticising Dragon Age 2(Not surprised honestly, that game was a rushed mess) and they got banned from the forum and their entire library. It drew quite a lot of internet attention though, so EA eventually unbanned them.
  • edited September 2011
    More like EA's done with you, as it seems.
  • edited September 2011
    Rawr wrote: »
    Didn't this happen on the Bioware forums? People were criticising Dragon Age 2(Not surprised honestly, that game was a rushed mess) and they got banned from the forum and their entire library. It drew quite a lot of internet attention though, so EA eventually unbanned them.

    If it did, then I had no idea a similar case happened. Then again, I had no idea was an EA product, so that shows how much I've been paying attention to their game library.

    You wouldn't happen to have a link to said internet attention, would you? Like on a Dragon Age fan site or something?

    More like EA's done with you, as it seems.
    Honestly, that wouldn't surprise me given the "We can delete your account for violating the TOS and not tell you about it" clause.
  • edited September 2011
    I'm not a fan of EA either. Some of their products are nice (Harry Potter 1 & 2 come to mind), but I certainly don't like EA itself.
  • edited September 2011
    I feel the same way about Disney. I like their products, but their company is really ugly in their wheelings and dealings.
  • edited September 2011
    This has happened before and they eventually ended up restoring the person account http://www.pcgamer.com/2011/03/15/dragon-age-2-access-returned-to-banned-forumite/
  • edited September 2011
    that teaches me not to actively visit EA related forums for fear of ticking someone off and getting access to my BioWare games locked.
  • edited September 2011
    That article suggest, or at least implies, that I need to make customer service aware that my account has been banned from the entire library. This won't end well for me.
  • edited September 2011
    Turns out the Dragon Age case was a different case entirely. He purchased a game and found out because of a comment he made previously, he wasn't allowed to play it on the day of purchase, making his transaction one that would impact EA directly (selling him a product he assumed would work but did in fact did not.)

    What's going on with me is simple: You get a ban from one title, you lose access to all the online services EA offers to you no matter what titles you own. If it has online features, they are locked down.

    So, yeah, I guess that means I can't play Spore until Friday, nor can I buy DLC from The Sims 3 Store until then as well.

    Though I will admit, I'm laughing at the idea of banning me from buying their product.:D
  • edited September 2011
    I don't understand DRM. Lawyers need to GTFO. Games are for fun. DRM is not fun. I will not buy a game with such intrusive DRM. Never have. Never will.
  • edited September 2011
    This isn't really about DRM, though. Yes, that was part of yet another major critique against EA and how they make their games, but at the end of the day, it's clear that unless you play Madden, which has an exclusive NFL license that can lose if they fail to represent the NFL at a level that satisfies football fans, they don't care about what you think about their DRM, their banning, Origin's EULA making it okay for them to install spyware, etc.
  • edited September 2011
    At the end of the day, if you say something out of line on a forum, the admins have the power and rite to terminate your ability to play a game. That's what I'm against. That's one of the many repercussions of this garbage infecting the video game industry.
  • edited September 2011
    It occurs to me that Steam is set up such that a user's Steam account and forum account are separate (even requiring separate passwords). I don't have rose colored glasses for any particular company, but it doesn't strike me that Valve would do something like EA has done.
  • edited September 2011
    TTG wouldn't do what EA has done. If they ban people form the forums or commenting on the blog, why would they ban them from buying their products?
  • edited September 2011
    Also, I will say this about TTG's community. You guys seem more level-headed. I've been posting this topic around on other sites I go to in order to get a better, well-rounded perspective on the situation, mostly to clear up my own confusion. It seems a lot of people are missing the point and are calling me an ass, saying that I deserved the banning.

    They seem to be missing the point entirely that it was a developer's decision to ban me for criticizing them, and not a forum moderator.

    Ironically, they've resorted to the same language I was reportedly banned for using.
  • edited September 2011
    Chyron8472 wrote: »
    It occurs to me that Steam is set up such that a user's Steam account and forum account are separate (even requiring separate passwords). I don't have rose colored glasses for any particular company, but it doesn't strike me that Valve would do something like EA has done.

    Valve is the only AAA game developing company I support anymore.
  • edited September 2011
    Valve is the only AAA game developing company I support anymore.

    Sorry for asking possibly stupid questions, but what is a "AAA game developing company"?
  • edited September 2011
    AAA. "Triple A." Meaning very good at what they do.

    I hesitate to give their support staff the same rating, since Civilization 4 (and its expansions) have had duplicate entries in Steam for the Mac versions for well over a year now.

    pqX6f.png
  • edited September 2011
    Triple A. As in not indie. Big developing/publishing company.
  • edited September 2011
    Wait, let me see if I have this right. EA banned you from your online account, which, if you have digital games bought, you can no longer access them? Or did they just ban you from any type of online activity, including in their games?

    Either way, man that's p. awful. It's a little rude to call someone an idiot, but it's still not worth a banning of a paying customer who is rightfully upset. Have you tried talking to a higher-up, basically anyone better than a forum mod who doesn't seem to be making the point clear anyway? If they're ignoring you, I highly suggest bringing this to the attention of someone other than us.
  • edited September 2011
    PecanBlue wrote: »
    Wait, let me see if I have this right. EA banned you from your online account, which, if you have digital games bought, you can no longer access them? Or did they just ban you from any type of online activity, including in their games?

    Either way, man that's p. awful. It's a little rude to call someone an idiot, but it's still not worth a banning of a paying customer who is rightfully upset. Have you tried talking to a higher-up, basically anyone better than a forum mod who doesn't seem to be making the point clear anyway? If they're ignoring you, I highly suggest bringing this to the attention of someone other than us.
    Both, actually. Spore I have a hard copy of, but I also registered my copy of The Sims 3 with them and discovered that when I got banned, I can't launch my game without going through a backdoor. There is an in-game log in for online features in The Sims 3, but when I attempted to sign on with that, it acted as if I never created an account. What I'm ultimately locked out of with this banning in my Sims 3 game is access to their DLC Store and uploading created content to my studio on their website.

    With Spore it's pretty clear. I'm banned, no new content for your game until the ban is lifted. That means that if I play that game in Offline Mode, once the game has used up all the content it currently has to populate my save game, that's it. I'll be running into empty planets, possibly even given repeat missions/Adventures because the game can't download any new content for me.

    I even tried to access my Origin account to check if EA did the biggest dick move they could do and cancel my pre-order and delete my remaining balance from the bank (which they can do according to the EULA). I can't even see that info. The only info I can see is my account settings, and naturally because of the ban, I can't update/change that info.

    I've tried to appeal that, but I couldn't talk to a higher authority because you can't get any higher than an actual game developer. All I've been told is that if my EA account gets hit with the ban-hammer, you lose all online features and services. And if your game is like Spore that requires an online connection for one reason or another? You're SOL.

    Like I said earlier, I've shopped this story around, and all I've been told is that I'm wrong, I was justifiably banned, and I deserved everything that has happened to me. EA did what they are suppose to do when dealing with "jerks like [me]" because of the language I used to critique them in my post.

    Speaking of which, I don't know if I mentioned this or not, but I was able to trick the forum and found the thread with the post that got me the banning. EA apparently deleted the post. There's no empty post box or a message from a mod where I posted saying "This message has been deleted." It's as if the post never happened. And the thread was locked because the majority of the posts in the thread that were still kept were saying the same thing I did. Most of them saying that EA should have took the faulty demo down and be held responsible for their error in this marketing effort for Pets.

    I've finally reached the point where I've stopped caring. It took me two days, but I'm here now. If they don't care about me as a player and consumer, then I just don't care about them and their game.

    Now someone recommend me a God game that isn't made by that company or any of the companies they own that can run on a 9 year old machine. If not, I'll go back to RCT3.
  • edited September 2011
    That is actually pretty damn ridiculous and I would advise leaving a review of some kind at least, people need to be aware of this stuff. (though really I think there aren't many people that aren't aware EA could be the Satan of game companies at this point) More Awesome Than You sounds like a good forum to at least report your experience, but really it's like preaching to the choir over there, though it can still potentially add some hefty fuel to the fire for EA.

    Also, what people told you you "deserved" the ban? Is it a specific forum that you wouldn't mind naming? It's kind of hard to believe anyone out there is really that much of a raving fanperson that they overlook a game company taking away someone's paid-for service "because they can." (really from what I am hearing that's pretty much what it is, since an upset customer calling the developers names after their own mess-up is like the typical routine for big companies)

    PS. RCT3 is a fun game, so's Zoo Tycoon 2 in other ways. I was thinking of trying Minecraft soon since everybody talks about it forever, but I don't know if it's really considered a God Game. I actually enjoyed the older Zoo Tycoons and RCTs as well, and older Sim Cities. (4 might still have that EA aspect connected to it)
  • edited September 2011
    What did you actually say?

    The Dragon Age 2 forums are, or at least were when the game came out, chock full to the brim of negativity and insults towards the developers. I can't imagine it wouldn't have made the vidya-game news sites if they'd been banning folks left and right at the time.
  • edited September 2011
    PecanBlue wrote: »
    Also, what people told you you "deserved" the ban? Is it a specific forum that you wouldn't mind naming? It's kind of hard to believe anyone out there is really that much of a raving fanperson that they overlook a game company taking away someone's paid-for service "because they can." (really from what I am hearing that's pretty much what it is, since an upset customer calling the developers names after their own mess-up is like the typical routine for big companies)
    I kind of do mind naming one site in particular, mostly because they are a small site based around movies that are just now getting into video games due to orders from higher ups. The webmaster even said that he didn't want to venture into video games, but he had to in order to please his bosses.

    The other site is a... well, I don't know how to describe it. It's Gaia Online, and granted that the majority of their users are teenagers who know nothing but DragonBallZ and Kingdom Hearts, I wanted to see what they thought about the subject matter. That's where I'm getting the bulk of the "you deserved it because you called them a bunch of idiots and weren't polite about it" and "it's their website, and they can do whatever they want to you."

    I recently posted this story on an Extra Credits fan site, as the banning apparently triggered something with my depression and I'm trying to figure out if I have Gaming Compulsion or not. They haven't said much about the subject at hand, since that technically isn't what the topic is about over there. Those that have commented have said generally the same thing as Gaia Online, only in a nicer tone.
    PecanBlue wrote:
    PS. RCT3 is a fun game, so's Zoo Tycoon 2 in other ways. I was thinking of trying Minecraft soon since everybody talks about it forever, but I don't know if it's really considered a God Game. I actually enjoyed the older Zoo Tycoons and RCTs as well, and older Sim Cities. (4 might still have that EA aspect connected to it)
    I do have the original RCT sitting in my drawer. I can't remember why I didn't like that game, but I suspect it had something to do with the nature of the Scenarios and lack of a Sandbox mode until RCT2.

    Never played Zoo Tycoon 2, but I have Zoo Tycoon 1... somewhere... I just have to find it.
    Scnew wrote: »
    What did you actually say?
    I would quote the post for you, but EA deleted it when I went hunting for the thread.

    Long story short, I called them a bunch of idiots. I listed my reasons, among them being a two year old bug that hasn't been fixed with an official patch but was fixed within a week by a hacker/modder, the fact that their most current expansion for the Sims kills/disables a game play feature rendering three careers for a player's Sims useless without risk of corrupting the game data, as well as outstanding issues with DLC advertised to do one thing but ultimately won't function because of compatibility issues. And with no communication between the developers and the player community, it's rather upsetting and disheartening to have to figure out how to play and what not to do while you play for the sake of being able to save your game. Even a "We're aware of the issue" post would be enough for a lot of people, but we don't even get that.

    In the context of the thread itself, the topic was me asking how the Sims 3 forum community felt about the Sims 3 facebook community claiming that it's the players fault EA's Pets demo corrupted their Saved Game data. Before the thread was locked and I was banned, most of the users that posted said the error was indeed EA's fault for releasing a faulty product and not taking it down immediately once reports of the issue began to flood the forums and not the fault of the player for choosing to download it. I don't know what happened to those users if they were banned or not, but I would suspect they were given what Customer Service told me.
Sign in to comment in this discussion.