I'm sure she would. That does not mean that I am interested in her nor the prospect of meaningless sex.
No, but it'd be funny to see her reaction. You can always say you were joking or that you're in a relationship if she actually peruses it. Not everything HAS to end in sex.
My thoughts on the "No sex before marriage" thing: I can see both arguements. However, I stand firmly in the camp where sex has to have meaning attatched to it. An emotional commitment between two consenting individuals. Not just doing it for the fun of it. Afterall, that's
what hands are for!
(I even disgusted myself there. Sorry! Spoilered for taste.) But sex always seems better when it's with someone you care about. I've never understood people who go out 'hunting' for someone for a one night stand or whatever. Or the 'I'd tap that!' comments that were so common back at college.
I'd say the chances of that are only slightly better than winning the lottery anyway.
Not really true. MMF is pretty easy to pull off. Find a handsome friend and just hit the club a lot. You'd be surprised how many women out there are looking for that experience.
FFM is a little harder, unless you go to Japan.
The women adore you as a western. Find a female with a lady friend and chances are that they'll take you home. =D
Not really true. MMF is pretty easy to pull off. Find a handsome friend and just hit the club a lot. You'd be surprised how many women out there are looking for that experience.
FFM is a little harder, unless you go to Japan.
The women adore you as a western. Find a female with a lady friend and chances are that they'll take you home. =D
Not really true. MMF is pretty easy to pull off. Find a handsome friend and just hit the club a lot. You'd be surprised how many women out there are looking for that experience.
Meh. Even that's not worth hitting the club a lot.
So... I'm really late to the discussion and I know I'm from Sin City and everything, but it's almost 2013 and we're STILL discussing homosexual relationships?
Seriously???
It's a biological occurrence to be attracted to the same gender. It's not gross, weird, blaspheme, or whatever. Same sex marriage has been legal over here since April 2001, but I don't have to tell you that gay people over here have been 'out' for a long time already. No one cares, even the religious political parties have accepted it.
I'm getting really tired of people treating homosexuality as a disease, it's not, like I said, it's a natural occurrence. It's not contagious and it does NOT make people less than other people.
Same sex marriage and especially homosexuality should be legal everywhere. Nothing will change and it will not affect the lives of heterosexual people at all. And for people who bring up religious arguments: Again, it's almost 2013. Time to accept science into your heart and not the words of some bearded drifters from 3000 years ago.
Let's start looking at each-others similarities instead of differences. That's much more interesting and useful.
So... I'm really late to the discussion and I know I'm from Sin City and everything, but it's almost 2013 and we're STILL discussing homosexual relationships?
Seriously???
It's a biological occurrence to be attracted to the same gender. It's not gross, weird, blaspheme, or whatever. Same sex marriage has been legal over here since April 2001, but I don't have to tell you that gay people over here have been 'out' for a long time already. No one cares, even the religious political parties have accepted it.
I'm getting really tired of people treating homosexuality as a disease, it's not, like I said, it's a natural occurrence. It's not contagious and it does NOT make people less than other people.
Same sex marriage and especially homosexuality should be legal everywhere. Nothing will change and it will not affect the lives of heterosexual people at all. And for people who bring up religious arguments: Again, it's almost 2013. Time to accept science into your heart and not the words of some bearded drifters from 3000 years ago.
Let's start looking at each-others similarities instead of differences. That's much more interesting and useful.
Ah, but cancer is also a natural occurence, but it is also a disease. 8)
My opinion is that it is a disease. The definition of disease is "A disorder of structure or function in a human, animal, or plant", which, given that one of the functions of all life is to reproduce, definitely covers homosexuality. Hating on people on that basis is akin to hating on mothers who cannot bear children, which would be seen as obscene.
However, it is a disease that really shouldn't be the cause of all the hatred. It doesn't harm anyone, is 'uncurable' and should just be accepted for what it is: harmless. The world should let us get on with our lives. A homosexual bond can be just as strong as a hetero bond, and it should be recognised as such.
Of course homosexuality as a 'disease' can only be considered as such if you believe (as I do) that it is not a conscious decision. But a result of genetics and the environment in which you are brought up in. Circumstances out of your control.
Ah, but cancer is also a natural occurence, but it is also a disease. 8)
My opinion is that it is a disease. The definition of disease is "A disorder of structure or function in a human, animal, or plant", which, given that one of the functions of all life is to reproduce, definitely covers homosexuality. Hating on people on that basis is akin to hating on mothers who cannot bear children, which would be seen as obscene.
However, it is a disease that really shouldn't be the cause of all the hatred. It doesn't harm anyone, is 'uncurable' and should just be accepted for what it is: harmless. The world should let us get on with our lives. A homosexual bond can be just as strong as a hetero bond, and it should be recognised as such.
Of course homosexuality as a 'disease' can only be considered as such if you believe (as I do) that it is not a conscious decision. But a result of genetics and the environment in which you are brought up in. Circumstances out of your control.
I'm not sure you'd want to use the term "disease" though. There's no such thing as a good disease and, by definition, all diseases have adverse effects on the diseased. Homosexuality doesn't have an adverse effect - not a physical one, at least. It doesn't even really hinder reproduction. The need and desire to reproduce is still a part of many homosexuals (as many adopted children and surrogate mothers can attest to) and the ability to reproduce still exists. True, heterosexual desire is meant, from a natural standpoint, to increase reproduction but that doesn't mean that the desire to reproduce doesn't exist outside heterosexual desire.
Rather than a disease, I'd just call it a personality trait.
Yeah, disease seems to imply that it can (and should) be cured. I'd probably go with a genetic change. As far as I know, there's no "gay gene", but there are a series of genes that can be turned on or off during development that might be responsible for sexuality depending on the environment that the fetus is in. I believe I read something about the amount and types of hormones available during that time.
So you'd be hard pressed to call this a disease. It's about as much a genetic thing as what shade of color your hair is... because that's caused by a bunch of genes getting turned on and off as well.
Actually, one time when I was in Japan I saw a bunch oƒ Japanese girls staring at me and giggling all excited like. Eventually, one came up to me and tried to “git with me.” That’s how she said it.
I can say that I personally know people who have threesomes, and I know enough that they're not making it up to impress me. (For some folks, it seems to be a way of life.) However, I do not personally know anyone who has won a big lottery prize, although it is possible I do but they're trying to keep it secret.
Comments
The best response to that, of course, is "Prove it!"
I'm sure she would. That does not mean that I am interested in her nor the prospect of meaningless sex.
Odd choice of words, I know.
Ah, the 50's, when EVERYTHING was evil, and root beer wasn't a soda.
I think that video is capable of making gays fear gays.
As my attempts to have sex thoroughly prove ...
(Sorry, it was there, could not resist)
I'd say the chances of that are only slightly better than winning the lottery anyway.
Your chances improve if you win the lottery.
We can't stop here, this is bat country!
ROFL.
Like this?
Not really true. MMF is pretty easy to pull off. Find a handsome friend and just hit the club a lot. You'd be surprised how many women out there are looking for that experience.
FFM is a little harder, unless you go to Japan.
The women adore you as a western. Find a female with a lady friend and chances are that they'll take you home. =D
Meh. Even that's not worth hitting the club a lot.
No, I pulled everything out of my ass.
Also, (insert sodomy/gay joke here.)
I can't think of a proper funny joke atm, but your comment practically begs for one.
I knew it would. I was divided between adding 'no pun intended' or not. But I was like ehh....let someone have his fun.
So that's where my umbrella went.
Seriously???
It's a biological occurrence to be attracted to the same gender. It's not gross, weird, blaspheme, or whatever. Same sex marriage has been legal over here since April 2001, but I don't have to tell you that gay people over here have been 'out' for a long time already. No one cares, even the religious political parties have accepted it.
I'm getting really tired of people treating homosexuality as a disease, it's not, like I said, it's a natural occurrence. It's not contagious and it does NOT make people less than other people.
Same sex marriage and especially homosexuality should be legal everywhere. Nothing will change and it will not affect the lives of heterosexual people at all. And for people who bring up religious arguments: Again, it's almost 2013. Time to accept science into your heart and not the words of some bearded drifters from 3000 years ago.
Let's start looking at each-others similarities instead of differences. That's much more interesting and useful.
Ah, but cancer is also a natural occurence, but it is also a disease. 8)
My opinion is that it is a disease. The definition of disease is "A disorder of structure or function in a human, animal, or plant", which, given that one of the functions of all life is to reproduce, definitely covers homosexuality. Hating on people on that basis is akin to hating on mothers who cannot bear children, which would be seen as obscene.
However, it is a disease that really shouldn't be the cause of all the hatred. It doesn't harm anyone, is 'uncurable' and should just be accepted for what it is: harmless. The world should let us get on with our lives. A homosexual bond can be just as strong as a hetero bond, and it should be recognised as such.
Of course homosexuality as a 'disease' can only be considered as such if you believe (as I do) that it is not a conscious decision. But a result of genetics and the environment in which you are brought up in. Circumstances out of your control.
I'm not sure you'd want to use the term "disease" though. There's no such thing as a good disease and, by definition, all diseases have adverse effects on the diseased. Homosexuality doesn't have an adverse effect - not a physical one, at least. It doesn't even really hinder reproduction. The need and desire to reproduce is still a part of many homosexuals (as many adopted children and surrogate mothers can attest to) and the ability to reproduce still exists. True, heterosexual desire is meant, from a natural standpoint, to increase reproduction but that doesn't mean that the desire to reproduce doesn't exist outside heterosexual desire.
Rather than a disease, I'd just call it a personality trait.
So you'd be hard pressed to call this a disease. It's about as much a genetic thing as what shade of color your hair is... because that's caused by a bunch of genes getting turned on and off as well.
Actually, one time when I was in Japan I saw a bunch oƒ Japanese girls staring at me and giggling all excited like. Eventually, one came up to me and tried to “git with me.” That’s how she said it.
I can say that I personally know people who have threesomes, and I know enough that they're not making it up to impress me. (For some folks, it seems to be a way of life.) However, I do not personally know anyone who has won a big lottery prize, although it is possible I do but they're trying to keep it secret.
I think you need a hard drink instead.
Ah innuendo, you have been a warm comfort to rely upon.
For one thing, I learned what a kinked helix is.