The Spectacular Marvel Super-Thread

Agent Coulson lives!

And good thing too, since he's headlining the new S.H.I.E.L.D. TV show.

This makes it even more of a must-watch than before. And it was already pretty must-watch, so...
«13456711

Comments

  • edited October 2012
    Yes, and it makes me wonder. Is this BEFORE The Avengers? And if it's after...HOW?!
  • edited October 2012
    Life Model Decoy.

    And then every episode a new Life Model Decoy dies in a new and creative way.
  • edited October 2012
    I neither know nor care as to how. All I know is I couldn't stop smiling for an hour after I found this out.

    But, to put some thought into it...

    A Life Model Decoy seems a little too sci-fi to throw at the audience. I know, sounds silly, but still. They could just hand-wave it by saying Nick Fury's lie was a little bigger than just getting red on his ledger cards. He was seriously injured and passed out, but was saved by the medics. Simple, believable, done.

    Or the show could be a prequel to The Avengers. I'm not such a huge fan of that idea, but it'd work too.
  • edited October 2012
    I was pretty sure that he'd be the lead in the show ever since they announced the show's existence. Because the other S.H.I.E.L.D. people are really big names that wouldn't normally be in TV shows. And Coulson is something of a fan favorite character with very little established continuity, which is something that Whedon would probably go for.
    A Life Model Decoy seems a little too sci-fi to throw at the audience. I know, sounds silly, but still. They could just hand-wave it by saying Nick Fury's lie was a little bigger than just getting red on his ledger cards. He was seriously injured and passed out, but was saved by the medics. Simple, easy, done.

    Well, that was mostly a joke since that's how the comics would have handled it. Though it's not an entirely new concept in the movieverse. Stark did try to pass himself off as one in Avengers. He was joking of course, but the reference was still made.
  • edited October 2012
    Well, there's a cellist. I think.
  • edited October 2012
    Still...if Coulson is brought back from the dead by whatever means...that'll be one of the first resurrections/"cop-outs" I've ever heard of Joss Whedon doing.
  • edited October 2012
    Coulson wasn't dead at all, confirmed by Joss Whedon even while the Avengers was still in theatres. Nick Fury, both in this continuity as well as most other continuities, is a chronic liar.
  • edited October 2012
    Still...if Coulson is brought back from the dead by whatever means...that'll be one of the first resurrections/"cop-outs" I've ever heard of Joss Whedon doing.

    Whedon's resurrected characters before. He resurrected Buffy twice, and had a quasi resurrection for Spike and Angel in the Buffyverse as well as a copout for Marty in Cabin in the Woods. There's a few other instances where he also brings characters back as ghosts or duplicates as well (like in Dollhouse, they can be brought back as memories).

    The reason he hasn't done it with the other fan favorite characters was that their deaths happened at the end of the series/show and there was no real need to bring them back. He also tends to leave characters dead if they died in a non-mystic way (like if they were shot) but tends to leave a loophole if they, say, fell through a portal into a hell dimension or something.
  • edited October 2012
    GaryCXJk wrote: »
    Coulson wasn't dead at all, confirmed by Joss Whedon even while the Avengers was still in theatres. Nick Fury, both in this continuity as well as most other continuities, is a chronic liar.

    Source?
  • edited October 2012
    Well that's a shame, I guess the writers have no backbone afterall.
  • edited October 2012
    Agent Coulson is very widely liked. Bringing him back doesn't show a lack of backbone. It shows that they respond to what people want. It also encourages people to watch the show - not that they needed encouragement, mind...
  • edited October 2012
    Some would say that succumbing to fan pressure would show a lack of backbone.

    However, I have no objection to him not having have died in the first place or coming back to life if there is a legitimate reason for him to do so that furthers the plot. If he just comes back because people want him to... I'd rather not have that.

    But I do love the idea of Fury just flat out lying. That is a good reason for Coulson to be alive... and pissed that his Captain America cards are now covered in blood.
  • edited October 2012
    Agent Coulson is very widely liked. Bringing him back doesn't show a lack of backbone. It shows that they respond to what people want. It also encourages people to watch the show - not that they needed encouragement, mind...

    That's EXACTLY why they have no backbone, they caved in to fan pressure.

    I like Coulson too. I didn't want him to die, but killing off a somewhat main character showed that there was some danger and threat to 'the avengers', this decision shows it was all just a flashy light show and that there won't be any tension at all in further movies or shows since we now know all the good guys are invulnerable.

    Thanos and the infinity gauntlet just got a whole lot more boring, send in the hulk and yawn through the rest. Anyone dies it'll just be a life model decoy or some other deus ex machina convenience.

    This has actually discouraged me from watching the show, I'll stick with 'Arrow'.
  • edited October 2012
    I want to debate this with you cormoran, but I really don't know how to counter your argument. You seem pretty set in your ways. I'll give it a go anyway though.

    Just because Coulson's death didn't stick this time doesn't mean the next one won't. It took a few deaths in Buffy for one to be permanent - Tara, for example. That came from nowhere and fucked things up but good. But just because one person's been brought back from the dead doesn't mean it'll happen all the time. Though it is a very comic-ish thing to do, so... :p

    Honestly, yeah. Supers won't die. That'd kill off any potential spin-off movies (like the Black Widow/Hawkeye espionage movie they should be making). So it's the normal people they'd kill off, if any. But the audience likes all the normal people, so it doesn't make much sense to kill them off for good. I do see your point. I do.

    But just because no-one's (probably) going to die doesn't mean there won't be any tension. You don't need a fatality to add drama to a story. You just need a well written story with an interesting narrative. High stakes helps, sure, but it doesn't have to mean people die. It could be the threat of people dying. Or it could be the possible annihilation of a planet. Or, hell - Joss has said he wants Avengers 2 to be smaller and more personal. It could be about driving the team apart and going back to fighting each other. That'd make for an interesting film.

    We don't know what the forthcoming films will be about. I'll wait for more info before dismissing them out of hand as you seem to be doing. And if you honestly yawned during the Hulk's fight scenes, then there's something wrong with you. :p
    Some would say that succumbing to fan pressure would show a lack of backbone.
    Fair enough. But they've said it wasn't just the fans who wanted him back. Clark Gregg's pretty popular with the team, from what I understand.
    However, I have no objection to him not having have died in the first place or coming back to life if there is a legitimate reason for him to do so that furthers the plot. If he just comes back because people want him to... I'd rather not have that.

    But I do love the idea of Fury just flat out lying. That is a good reason for Coulson to be alive... and pissed that his Captain America cards are now covered in blood.
    Agreed. The idea I had is that Fury said Coulson was dead to spur the team on, and the 'bloody' cards were an extension of that. If/when the team find out Coulson's not dead, they're happy to see him and furious at Fury, thus providing conflict for Avengers 2 or whenever.

    Maybe there'll be a scene in the show with Coulson on the phone pestering Fury to buy him a new set to replace the ones he ruined. That'd be a very 'him' thing to do.
  • edited October 2012
    cormoran wrote: »
    That's EXACTLY why they have no backbone, they caved in to fan pressure.

    I like Coulson too. I didn't want him to die, but killing off a somewhat main character showed that there was some danger and threat to 'the avengers', this decision shows it was all just a flashy light show and that there won't be any tension at all in further movies or shows since we now know all the good guys are invulnerable.

    Thanos and the infinity gauntlet just got a whole lot more boring, send in the hulk and yawn through the rest. Anyone dies it'll just be a life model decoy or some other deus ex machina convenience.

    This has actually discouraged me from watching the show, I'll stick with 'Arrow'.

    I think it really depends on the reason why they do it. If there's a good reason, plotwise, then I'm totally okay with it.

    In addition, there doesn't necessarily need to be physical danger to the main character(s) of comic/show/movie for there to be tension. The tension can come instead from the character's self destructive habits (such as Tony Stark's alcoholism) or mental instability (Banner... just Banner). Whedon has already mentioned that the next movie will get more personal, which leads me to believe that the danger won't be so much a physical threat as something more insidious that plays on their insecurities to tear the team down again.

    And if that's not how the next movie goes, I'm totally writing a fanfiction with a villain who takes them apart piece by piece because that sounds like the sort of thing I'd like to read.
  • edited October 2012
    cormoran wrote: »
    That's EXACTLY why they have no backbone, they caved in to fan pressure.

    How did they cave to fan pressure? I don't know about you guys, but I sure haven't seen forums up in arms that Coulson died and demanding that he be put on the SHIELD TV show. I think the team behind it recognizes that Coulson is the face of SHIELD to a lot of people now and having him in the series is the best way to tie everything together without paying Samuel L Jackson exorbitant amounts to guest star once and a while.
  • edited October 2012
    How did they cave to fan pressure? I don't know about you guys, but I sure haven't seen forums up in arms that Coulson died and demanding that he be put on the SHIELD TV show. I think the team behind it recognizes that Coulson is the face of SHIELD to a lot of people now and having him in the series is the best way to tie everything together without paying Samuel L Jackson exorbitant amounts to guest star once and a while.

    You may want to check IMDB, it was rife with save coulson threads when avengers came out.
  • edited October 2012
    cormoran wrote: »
    You may want to check IMDB, it was rife with save coulson threads when avengers came out.
    That's just fans for you. They'll demand anything on the internet. Even a reboot of a crappy 90s CGI cartoon.
  • edited October 2012
    This makes me happy. So, so happy.
  • edited October 2012
    As happy as your avatar? 'cause that's how happy it makes me.
  • edited October 2012
    Maybe in Iron Man 3 there will be slight hints that he survived the wound and is still in recover...

    Oh, fuck it, who am I kidding? He’s as dead as Lee Everett.
  • edited October 2012
    I think if he showed up in any movie other than the next Avengers, it should be the next Hulk movie (assuming that there will be one... I really hope there will be one) because I think it would be hilarious to have him return in a movie where nobody would remember him. I don't think that he and Banner were ever in the same room the entire Avengers movie... I'll have to double check on that, but I'm pretty sure they never met. Or at the very least, never talked.
  • edited October 2012
    Don't really feel like starting a new thread for this, and since it's related to the whole Marvel movie universe (probably), here seemed a good fit.

    But anyway, the Ant Man movie is definitely happening, and it'll be out in November 2015, AFTER Avengers 2, which is due in May of the same year. Subject to changes and whatnot, of course.
  • edited October 2012
    Am I the only one who initially read the thread title as "Agent Coolsome"?
  • edited October 2012
    Don't really feel like starting a new thread for this, and since it's related to the whole Marvel movie universe (probably), here seemed a good fit.

    But anyway, the Ant Man movie is definitely happening, and it'll be out in November 2015, AFTER Avengers 2, which is due in May of the same year. Subject to changes and whatnot, of course.

    Huh. I thought Avengers 2 was slated for 2016. Not that I'm complaining or anything.

    Now where's my next Hulk movie?
    Chyron8472 wrote: »
    Am I the only one who initially read the thread title as "Agent Coolsome"?

    Nope. XD
  • edited October 2012
    Huh. I thought Avengers 2 was slated for 2016. Not that I'm complaining or anything.

    Now where's my next Hulk movie?
    Well we've got Iron Man 3 and Thor 2 next year, and 2014's got Captain America 2 and Guardians of the Galaxy. We'll probably have to wait 'til 2016 for any possible Hulk movie. :(
  • edited October 2012
    Well we've got Iron Man 3 and Thor 2 next year, and 2014's got Captain America 2 and Guardians of the Galaxy. We'll probably have to wait 'til 2016 for any possible Hulk movie. :(

    This makes me sad. Hulk needs a movie... and by movie, I mean a good movie.
  • edited October 2012
    He could get a TV show... ;)
  • edited October 2012
    He could get a TV show... ;)

    He could be in the S.H.I.E.L.D. show! Coulson and Banner, buddy cop team.

    "You don't want to make my buddy here angry. You wouldn't like him when he's angry..."
  • edited October 2012
    He could be in the S.H.I.E.L.D. show! Coulson and Banner, buddy cop team.

    "You don't want to make my buddy here angry. You wouldn't like him when he's angry..."

    Okay, THAT sounds like a winner. Seriously. I'm all for it.
  • edited October 2012
    Okay, THAT sounds like a winner. Seriously. I'm all for it.

    And in an ironic twist, Banner is the good cop.
  • edited October 2012
    Oh, they're both good cops. One has to be, and the other... well, it's impossible to view Coulson as a bad cop.
  • edited October 2012
    Oh, they're both good cops. One has to be, and the other... well, it's impossible to view Coulson as a bad cop.

    This is true.
  • edited October 2012
    It would be more like good cop, oh god where's the door, I can't open the door, oh god please help me!
  • edited October 2012
    I think I may need to make this a thing in some capacity. Because now that I've thought of it, my brain just won't let it go.
  • edited October 2012
    There is supposed to be a Hulk TV show eventually, and Guillermo Del Toro is behind it. He spoke about it recently, and said it's still in production. That's all I know.
  • edited October 2012
    There is supposed to be a Hulk TV show eventually, and Guillermo Del Toro is behind it. He spoke about it recently, and said it's still in production. That's all I know.

    Fuck you, Lou Ferigno!
  • edited October 2012
    I'm usually pretty picky when it comes to reviving characters (I don't really like this concept as it usually cheapens the character's death greatly), but for Agent Coulson I'm going to make an exception. I mean, we never actually saw him die and the only 'proof' we've got is Nick Fury's words (who tends to lie a lot) and a deck of cards with blood on it (which were taken from Coulson's locker by Fury... who lied about Coulson having them on him, again :p ). But even if Coulson DID die and they're gonna use magic jumbo-bumbo to revive him... as long as the TV show is awesome, I'm fine with it.

    SON OF COUL LIVES!
  • edited October 2012
    Well we've got Iron Man 3 and Thor 2 next year, and 2014's got Captain America 2 and Guardians of the Galaxy. We'll probably have to wait 'til 2016 for any possible Hulk movie. :(

    Next year also has Wolverine, you know. And 2014 has Spider-Man 2 and X-Men: Second Class.
  • edited October 2012
    Yeah, you're right, but they're by other studios and aren't connected. Hulk's movie rights are owned by Marvel though, and that's what I was referring to.
Sign in to comment in this discussion.