What is the Worst Movie You Have Ever Seen

12467

Comments

  • The worst Movie ever was Shark Week. Period.

  • edited November 2014

    Harry Potter. I haven't seen any of the films but I know I hate it.

  • edited November 2014

    Wait wait wait! You hate it even though you haven't seen any of them?! I know it's a matter of a opinion, but still. There actuary really good for the most part. I'm sorry if I've taken this the wrong way, but... It sounds like your just judging a book by the cover or in this case a movie by it's trailer.

    Again, sorry if I've taken this the wrong way.

    sprocket23 posted: »

    Harry Potter. I haven't seen any of the films but I know I hate it.

  • "there are several versions which are different" that is true, but the difference is very small, Peter Parker is Peter Parker, you can't change that

    pcharl01 posted: »

    As a person who did not read any spiderman comics, is there a particular era/series/age you are speaking of? I know there are several versions which are different maybe the character are more true to another era or series of said comic?

  • I was kind of half joking when I said it. I have heard of it and it really doesn't sound like my cup of tea. It just sounds really stupid and just crap.

    NoHopeLeft posted: »

    Wait wait wait! You hate it even though you haven't seen any of them?! I know it's a matter of a opinion, but still. There actuary really go

  • Okay, i did take it the wrong way, sorry. if something isn't your cup of tea, then it isn't your cup of tea.

    They do sound kind of stupid, to me their just fun and enjoyable films.

    sprocket23 posted: »

    I was kind of half joking when I said it. I have heard of it and it really doesn't sound like my cup of tea. It just sounds really stupid and just crap.

  • If you see them you'd know they're probably some of the best movies out there :P

    sprocket23 posted: »

    Harry Potter. I haven't seen any of the films but I know I hate it.

  • Slashers which you describe are shit.

    But true 'Horror' is pretty damn good if you're into it.

    Most horror movies. They are just dumb...

  • Welcome to Earf.

    Alt text

    I didn't hate the second Fred as much as the other two, but they were all pretty bad. Joel Schumacher almost killed Batman. Also, BAT

  • The best movie is Fight Club. Shit, I just broke the rule...

    Green613 posted: »

    If you see them you'd know they're probably some of the best movies out there :P

  • Actually the Human Centipede 2 is abhorrent and nothing more than babboon fecal matter.

    pcharl01 posted: »

    I walked out of the theater when watching Dreamcatcher. Hated that shit. I recently saw Slither which was horrible. But I'd say the worst

  • Sometimes it's very easy to mix up the two...I don't like either.

    Churned posted: »

    Slashers which you describe are shit. But true 'Horror' is pretty damn good if you're into it.

  • Eragon was just awful.

  • edited November 2015

    "Noah" was not only terrible as a movie, it was also just down right insulting to the Bible and Christians. I refused to see it after reading a review about it. I am appalled that Hollywood thinks that it is ok to desecrate such a universally significant book, that it is ok to take pieces from the Bible, twist it into something nearly unrecognizable for the sake of making money. I understand that not everyone is a Christian, and that some see the Bible as fiction, but it isn't fiction to a great number of us, and the fact that this was even allowed to become a movie..I am beyond angry about it. And now it's happening again with the movie "Exodus", where the man playing Moses isn't even Jewish, who also believes that Moses was schizophrenic and barbaric, which he learned from reading the freaking Quran, and he hasn't even read the Bible. I'm just disgusted with Hollywood at this point.

    Kenny/Lee posted: »

    True Grit: the 2010 remake. The whole movie I found to be unbearably dry. The actors themselves are wonderfully talented, but the script f

  • I'm still waiting for Eldest...

    fallandir posted: »

    Eragon was just awful.

  • Harry Potter sucks

    sprocket23 posted: »

    Harry Potter. I haven't seen any of the films but I know I hate it.

  • People should have the freedom to make whatever films they want, they absolutely should have been allowed to make it. Are you also disgusted at Thor? He is a god too. Who the hell do you think you are, movies are made about books all the time. And hardly any stay true to the book. The bible and the quran are also books which can be made into movies. Just because some people are emotionally tied to these books doesn't mean others freedom should be infringed upon.

    Tinni posted: »

    "Noah" was not only terrible as a movie, it was also just down right insulting to the Bible and Christians. I refused to see it after readin

  • Well we're both in agreement that the film: Noah, was an atrocity.
    It showed such a lack of respect for the Bible, a book which the Constitution was based on.
    It also showed a complete lack of respect for God, who is the wise and benevolent creator of us all.

    It totally falsified the origin of the Nephilim, which were portrayed as angels who were encased in rock after coming to earth.
    According to the Bible: Angels came down to earth; and materialized into men, married women; and had children by them.
    These children, half Angel/half human hybrids, grew up to become giants; that became known as Nephilim, which means: "Fellers, those that cause others to fall."
    According to the Bible, the Nephilim, and their materialized fathers, spread violence throughout the earth.

    So for Hollywood to take these ancient bullies, and twist them into heroes is completely inexcusable.

    And it also portrayed Noah, a prophet of God, to be an utter lunatic, in fact watching the movies portrayal of him, reminded of Anthony Hopkins: "Hannibal."
    The Bible describes Noah as a decent man.
    And as a prophet, he must've spoken to others about why he was building the Ark, and encouraged them to help him, and enter into it with him.
    For Hollywood to portray Noah as a anti-social lunatic, is a complete abomination.

    I don't hold the actors responsible, as they have a job to do, and have to work within the guidelines of the script they're given.
    In many respects, an actor is only as good as his script.
    No matter how good the actor himself is, if the script is weak, then it doesn't matter what his acting talent is, the film is still gonna be terrible.
    Rather, I blame the writers, and the director of the film: Noah.

    I'm not so sure though about the new movie: Exodus.
    I'm gonna give it a chance, but if I don't like what I see, I'm walking out.
    As far as not having a Jewish actor to play Moses, I personally don't see how that makes a big difference.
    Charlton Heston, was of Scottish decent, and yet his portrayal of Moses, is probably one of the most memorable performances of his career, the second being: Ben-Hur.

    Now I do know that Ridley Scot is a fabulous director.
    His film: Gladiator, proved that.
    I realize that he to is an atheist, same as the guy who directed Noah.
    However, from what I've read about the film, and mind you I always show a bit of skepticism when I read stuff online; as it's not always true, I personally have not read anything about Scot referencing the Koran, in filming his new movie: "Exodus, Gods and Kings."

    Tinni posted: »

    "Noah" was not only terrible as a movie, it was also just down right insulting to the Bible and Christians. I refused to see it after readin

  • Are you also offended by all the other movies that didn't stay true to the book? Must be awfully tiresome being offended by so many movies.

    Kenny/Lee posted: »

    True Grit: the 2010 remake. The whole movie I found to be unbearably dry. The actors themselves are wonderfully talented, but the script f

  • edited November 2014

    I believe the point Tinni is attempting to make, is that since the Bible, like the Koran, is a book about a particular religion.
    And since religion is an especially delicate subject, people should be very careful not to say or do anything that would degradate it, so as to not cause offense.
    When dealing with such a delicate subject, extra care is required.

    sprocket23 posted: »

    People should have the freedom to make whatever films they want, they absolutely should have been allowed to make it. Are you also disgusted

  • edited November 2014

    Religion already gets enough special treatment, it in no way deserves more. If you think about it everything offends at least someone. What if someone was offended by the blood and gore in the walking dead? Should the developers reduce the amount of blood and gore in the game just in case they offend these people? No. Its those peoples perogative to not play the game. Just how it's religious peoples prerogative to not watch films that "offend" them. The people making the film shouldn't have to walk on eggshells just in case they offend. They can be as "offensive" as they damn well please. Just because some people are over sensitive about religion doesn't mean people have to take care as to not "offend" them. Its the religious persons problem, not anyone else's. People can criticize religion all they want, religious people shouldn't be pandered to.

    Kenny/Lee posted: »

    I believe the point Tinni is attempting to make, is that since the Bible, like the Koran, is a book about a particular religion. And since

  • It was an embarrassing adaptation, I'll give you that.

    fallandir posted: »

    Eragon was just awful.

  • All obvious differences in the content of the book make me dislike the adaptation. That's why I didn't like The Hobbit.

    Lahkesis posted: »

    It was an embarrassing adaptation, I'll give you that.

  • edited November 2014

    People are not required to take extra caution regarding a religious book (or any book for that matter) in the hopes of not offending others, nor should they be restricted to write books, direct movies, etc, in the way they want to. They have the freedom of expression to do what you are saying they shouldn't do. I admit, I've never seen Noah nor do I have any intention too, but Hollywood had every right to develop that movie whether you liked it or not. Even if what was in movie wasn't exactly how it was portrayed in the bible, I grant it that it couldn't have been any worse than some of the books, movies and even games I've seen/played that flat out make a mockery of Christianity, such as portraying Yahweh as an evil tyrant while making Lucifer to be some sort of anti-hero. Sure, I can see many people taking offense to that, but those writers have the freedom of expression to tell stories like that and if you don't like them, then simply pay them no mind.

    Kenny/Lee posted: »

    I believe the point Tinni is attempting to make, is that since the Bible, like the Koran, is a book about a particular religion. And since

  • Disaster Movie. I literally can't go through that movie without throwing up.

  • edited November 2014

    I can't believe you just compared the story of Thor with the Bible. If you can seriously make that comparison, then there is no use even talking to you about this matter.

    sprocket23 posted: »

    People should have the freedom to make whatever films they want, they absolutely should have been allowed to make it. Are you also disgusted

  • edited November 2014

    I agree wholeheartedly.

    I can cope with the actor not being Jewish, because you're right about Heston's portrayal still being amazing though he is Scottish. But the actor in this case, who is Christian Bale, doesn't seem to have any respect for Moses or the Bible for that matter, seeing as he's the one who hasn't read it, and believes Moses is insane and barbaric because of what he read in the Quran. tbh I'm not going to see it. The moment I read that it's going to be an earthquake that parts the Red Sea, and not the winds..I'm out. I refuse to watch any Biblical films that don't stay true, or at least try to stay as true as possible to scripture.

    Kenny/Lee posted: »

    Well we're both in agreement that the film: Noah, was an atrocity. It showed such a lack of respect for the Bible, a book which the Constit

  • Ugh, I just remembered The Love Guru. What possessed my mom to buy it on DVD, I don't know.

  • They are both Gods people have believed in, I fail to see how that is not a fair comparison. The only difference is the time period.

    Tinni posted: »

    I can't believe you just compared the story of Thor with the Bible. If you can seriously make that comparison, then there is no use even talking to you about this matter.

  • It is a pretty accurate comparison though.

    Tinni posted: »

    I can't believe you just compared the story of Thor with the Bible. If you can seriously make that comparison, then there is no use even talking to you about this matter.

  • a book which the Constitution was based on.

    You believe that?

    Do you live in America and have you ever had a history class?

    Kenny/Lee posted: »

    Well we're both in agreement that the film: Noah, was an atrocity. It showed such a lack of respect for the Bible, a book which the Constit

  • edited November 2014

    The point Sprocket23 is trying to make is that many individuals in the world view both, the Norse god Thor and the Bible (like you said) as a work of fiction. And a lot of people (particularly the Vikings) did believe in Thor back then. We even have a day named after him. Because some people regard the various bible stories as myths; writers, producers, and developers should be able to use remnants from those stories as inspirations to portray more dramatic events or create new compelling story arcs without caring if the audience gets offended. People do it all the time with other religions, whether it's Islam, Judaism, Buddhism, Hinduism, Shintoism, or whatever. So why should Christianity get special privileges? As I mentioned before, I haven't seen the movie, but I highly doubt it "disrespects" or "insults" Christians, the Bible, and God compared to other stuff I've seen that literally do that with intent.

    Tinni posted: »

    I can't believe you just compared the story of Thor with the Bible. If you can seriously make that comparison, then there is no use even talking to you about this matter.

  • I was gonna bring that up too, but I didn't feel like typing an entire essay. XD

    a book which the Constitution was based on. You believe that? Do you live in America and have you ever had a history class?

  • I hate people who live in America and say that shit...Like...Do you even know your history?

    AGenesis posted: »

    I was gonna bring that up too, but I didn't feel like typing an entire essay. XD

  • edited November 2014

    You say Christian Bale's interpretation of Moses' character, is from what he picked up from reading the Koran?
    Where did you hear that?
    I've never heard him say that in any interviews on the film, but then again, I've never actually seen any interviews about the film either.
    Lol!

    Are you sure it's Christian Bale you heard this about?
    Or is it about the director Ridley Scot?
    The reason I ask is because I know that Scot is an atheist, and we've already seen how one atheist treated the Bible, with the film Noah.
    As for Bale, I don't know what his religious beliefs are.

    And about Moses, from what I've seen in the trailers for the film, Moses seems to be a warrior.
    That in itself might have some truth in it.
    Why would I say that?
    Well think about it, Moses was brought up in the royal house of Pharaoh.
    There he received a very high level of education, not just in Government-related matters, but also in sciences, architecture, as well many other things.
    And as a member the royal family, that education surely was not purely secular, but he was probably also trained in the art of war, and trained how to fight.
    After all, Egyptian records speak of the Pharaohs actually leading military campaigns.
    Whether or not Moses was ever in a battle during his time in Egypt; before spending 40 years in Midian; where he fled after murdering an Egyptian, is not known.

    Tinni posted: »

    I agree wholeheartedly. I can cope with the actor not being Jewish, because you're right about Heston's portrayal still being amazing tho

  • edited November 2014

    Yes, I'm sure. Just type in "Christian Bale" along with "Moses is schizophrenic" and there are a bunch of articles about him making those references. I looked into the movie when I heard about it, hoping that it would be true to scripture unlike "Noah" and "Son of God", but unfortunately it's not from what I've read.

    I don't know what his beliefs are either, but I wouldn't be surprised if he practices Islam, which is quite popular in Hollywood.

    Kenny/Lee posted: »

    You say Christian Bale's interpretation of Moses' character, is from what he picked up from reading the Koran? Where did you hear that? I'

  • edited November 2014

    I don't think anyone actually thinks that there should be any sort of legal restriction behind making these movies (can't honestly tell if you were implying this or not). It's just the fact that these projects even get taken up and supported that bothers certain people. Of course everyone has freedom of expression, but I'm sure you would agree that there are some distasteful products of this. I think people of faith only wish that those at Hollywood would take more care in expressing what certain audiences may consider distasteful.

    I personally just roll my eyes and move on with my life, but I see why some people have a serious issue. The only movie with religious connotations that legitimately pissed me off was "The Invention of Lying". I seriously couldn't stand that..

    AGenesis posted: »

    People are not required to take extra caution regarding a religious book (or any book for that matter) in the hopes of not offending others,

  • edited November 2014

    I to was hoping they'd stay truer to Scripture.
    But after hearing this, I will not go see it.
    And I did Google the subject you mentioned, and I was absolutely appalled at what I read.
    To describe Moses as Schizophrenic, a man who in essence; founded Judaism, and who is held in high regard by the world's three major religions, is completely despicable.
    Even if a person is not religious, they should at least show respect for those of us that are.

    And I'm surprised to hear that Islam is real popular in Hollywood.
    Considering the state of the country, and the constant news about terrorist groups.

    And about the film: "The Son Of God," I never went to go see it.
    But I'm not surprised to hear that it was very inaccurate.

    On a personal note, and again this is purely personal, the biggest objection I have to a lot of Jesus films, is the way Jesus is made up.
    In so many of them, Jesus looks horribly thin; almost emaciated.
    Even if Jesus was on thinner side, I would think he'd look pretty fit, with strong hands and arms, considering he was a carpenter, which was a very physically demanding job back then.

    Tinni posted: »

    Yes, I'm sure. Just type in "Christian Bale" along with "Moses is schizophrenic" and there are a bunch of articles about him making those re

Sign in to comment in this discussion.