The Newly Regenerated Doctor Who Thread

18788909293103

Comments

  • edited May 2013
    Also
    they re-appear in The Name Of The Doctor and apparently not everyone survives, so...

    But
    Clara will be there and shes far more death prone.
  • edited May 2013
    It'd be impractical for a spin-off as it'd require two of three leads to wear heavy prosthetics for 26 weeks a year (assuming they did 13 episodes)...

    Also his name is Strax. Drax is the bad guy from Moonraker.
  • edited May 2013
    If I had the money, that bitch'd be mine.
  • edited May 2013
    Ribs wrote: »
    Ebay wrote:
    With the 50th anniversary coming this November, you might wanna grab this once in a lifetime Dr Who Robot very quick, it's not like another is gonna come along and it will only go up in value!

    I guess if this were auctioned at a high profile Dr Who themed Bonhams auction (I've bought many an item from those!) it would be valued at £20,000 to £30,000 upwards, due to it's uniqueness! This is eBay however so make the most of this while you can, it will probably never show it's face on the open market again!

    Riiiiiiiight. Just giving it away out of a sense of charity, right?
  • edited May 2013
    Ian Levine's now claiming they're fakes, so hold onto your wallets, please.
  • edited May 2013
    I actually quite enjoyed Saturday's episode, which surprised me considering how awful it looked in the trailer. It actually made me laugh a few times too.

    Neil Gaiman's episode on Saturday looks to be just as awesome as his previous one.
  • edited May 2013
    Friar wrote: »
    Neil Gaiman's episode on Saturday looks to be just as awesome as his previous one.

    Undoubtedly, seeing as the publicity pic in today's Radio Times is a clear ripoff of a major element of a Big Finish audio (I thought "The Doctor's Wife" was rubbish, and with the rest of this series being the way it is have fairly low expectations).
  • edited May 2013
    Very, very exciting spoiler (possibly) from a source that's fairly reputable:
    Paul McGann has filmed his regeneration scene.

    I thought I'd never see the day...
  • edited May 2013
    Seems very unlikely.
    Link to source?
  • edited May 2013
    Serec wrote: »
    Seems very unlikely.
    Link to source?

    It's a good source that I can't mention but yes I do believe it at least for the moment. Plus we've still not had any definitive statement on anything related to someone not appearing in the special and anything to the contrary you've heard is not from the BBC itself.
  • edited May 2013
    The problem with this is that
    Paul McGann regenerates into Christopher Eccleston, implying that he would take part as well, and he's already stated that he's not doing so
    . My main issue with this.
  • edited May 2013
    Who said he regenerates into Christopher Eccleston?
  • edited May 2013
    Oh, now you're just being silly.
    Are you implying that he regenerates into John Hurt?
  • JenniferJennifer Moderator
    edited May 2013
    Everyone knows that Rowan Atkinson's doctor was the next regeneration after Paul McGann.
  • edited May 2013
    Rowan Atkinson's Doctor was the Tenth Doctor, though. According to him.

    Maybe his Doctor couldn't count...
  • edited May 2013
    Serec wrote: »
    Oh, now you're just being silly.
    Are you implying that he regenerates into John Hurt?
    It'd make more sense if Matt Smith regenerated into John Hurt. I don't understand this eighth-and-a-half Doctor theory. I mean, if this is the gimmick for the 50th Anniversary, what would Eccles have done in the original draft? If, as has been suggested, John Hurt replaced him?
  • edited May 2013
    It'd make more sense if Matt Smith regenerated into John Hurt. I don't understand this eighth-and-a-half Doctor theory. I mean, if this is the gimmick for the 50th Anniversary, what would Eccles have done in the original draft? If, as has been suggested, John Hurt replaced him?
    Oh, Don't get me wrong, we're in agreement here.
    I was making a guess as to what Ribs was eluding to.

    It's a shame Chris is being a stick in the mud.
  • edited May 2013
    Booo.

    Reports at lunchtime were that the Baftas on Sunday would feature a special "Doctor Who" sketch to celebrate the 50th Anniversary - a perfect opportunity, perhaps, for earlier Doctors?

    Well, anyway, it's now been downgraded to just a montage of poxy clips. :mad:

    But on the plus side, today's episode was actually pretty damn' good by modern standards.
  • edited May 2013
    I see we all enjoyed the Football match tonight then.
  • edited May 2013
    Is it me, or did the Cybermen seem more like the Borg in this episode? Also, I'm not sure is that was spoiler worthy.
  • edited May 2013
    That was a good episode. The cybermen where much cooler then they have been before. And the
    Doctor Cyber thing was funny as an hammy villain
  • edited May 2013
    I thought the Iron men were awesome.
  • edited May 2013
    Friar wrote: »
    I thought the Iron men were awesome.

    Certainly stronger then the ones in Iron Man 3.
  • edited May 2013
    The plot was certainly better.

    Also, prequel.
  • edited May 2013
    Friar wrote: »
    The plot was certainly better.


    To bad the child actors wernt as good.
  • edited May 2013
    It'd make more sense if Matt Smith regenerated into John Hurt. I don't understand this eighth-and-a-half Doctor theory. I mean, if this is the gimmick for the 50th Anniversary, what would Eccles have done in the original draft? If, as has been suggested, John Hurt replaced him?

    I'd imagine that his role would be to shed some light on the Time War since he was closer to it. But if we have this extra Doctor in there, he can do it instead. Sure, they could also get Paul McGann, but since the movie wasn't totally well received, that would be a risk and they don't want to take risks with the 50th Anniversary.

    Of course, sticking in a new Doctor is also a risk, so I'm not exactly unhappy with the decision. It could be very interesting. And it gives us a multi-Doctor episode.

    Who knows, maybe they'll do more stuff with it.
    coolsome wrote: »
    To bad the child actors wernt as good.

    After seeing how good a child actor can be from Iron Man... yeah. Incredibly flat delivery.
  • edited May 2013
    Heh I know this isn't the place but I thought the plot of Iron Man 3 was great.

    Anywho about Doctor Who..THERES NO RANI figures!!! This is a semi outrage.
  • edited May 2013
    I hate having to wait another week. Worst thing is, I don't know if Belgium receives BBC1, as I'll be staying there.

    Oh well, better find a live stream of BBC1 somewhere...
  • edited May 2013
    I....uh. Well, I genuinely don't know how to feel about that episode. I love the new Cybermen redesign, especially the faces, and the story was certainly enjoyable. Neil's a great writer, and his dialogue (apart from a few clunkers: "Put me down, I hate you"?) sparkled.

    Those points aside, I think the television series has forgotten what makes the Cybermen so scary in the first place, which is that they're really fighting for survival--they're a human species that has lost all humanity in order to continue. Essentially, they're medicine taken to its utmost extreme, to the point of removing emotions as a "sickness." The CyberPlanner was full of emotions in this episode, and the Cybermen themselves almost seemed like simply robots, not the half-human, half-machine creatures they were to begin with. I found it very hard to care about them or feel sorry for their situation, which means they really could have been any sort of generic monster.

    "Spare Parts," from Big Finish, remains the most heart-wrenching and genuinely terrifying Cyberman story, until a writer who works with these concepts can get a place on the show.

    EDIT: This all being said, I love "The Invasion" to pieces, so make of this critique what you will.
  • JenniferJennifer Moderator
    edited May 2013
    Mr Nutt wrote: »
    Is it me, or did the Cybermen seem more like the Borg in this episode?
    Definitely. But it suited them well, I thought. The ability to upgrade their hardware made them more terrifying.
    Those points aside, I think the television series has forgotten what makes the Cybermen so scary in the first place, which is that they're really fighting for survival--they're a human species that has lost all humanity in order to continue. Essentially, they're medicine taken to its utmost extreme, to the point of removing emotions as a "sickness." The CyberPlanner was full of emotions in this episode, and the Cybermen themselves almost seemed like simply robots, not the half-human, half-machine creatures they were to begin with. I found it very hard to care about them or feel sorry for their situation, which means they really could have been any sort of generic monster.
    I thought they dealt with the fighting to survive angle quite well with their upgrading to use any biological material, rather than just human, along with the afforementioned ability to upgrade on the fly as well. Sure, they were completely unemotional and more like robots than human hybrids, but purging themselves of emotions was always one of their goals. Since this is an extreme evolution of the Cybermen (necessitated by the fact that the Cybermen were nearly completely wiped out to the point they were thought extinct), I thought their depiction made perfect sense, and thought they were handled quite well.

    None of the other in-progress Cybermen were emotional, so the Cyber Planner being full of emotion was likely do to a hiccup in the conversion process due to the Doctor's Time Lord physiology (as was the fact that the Doctor still controlled an equal part of his brain as the Cyber Planner did).

    I personally loved this episode, and I loved the evolution of the Cybermen here. I'm personally hoping for some sort of similar evolution for the Daleks at some point.
  • edited May 2013
    I might even go so far to say that the fact that the Cyber Planner was so emotional was a big part of the reason for his downfall. He could get distracted.
  • edited May 2013
    Just a head's up, the doctor's name has apparently been leaked, thanks to early shipping of the DVD boxset in america. So good luck avoiding it for the next week.
  • edited May 2013
    Oh yeah. The Doctor's name is
    unpronounceable
    .
  • edited May 2013
    What a strange name.
  • edited May 2013
    By the gods it makes sense!
  • edited May 2013
    Oh yeah. The Doctor's name is
    unpronounceable
    .

    Don't be silly, we all know his name is
    Dick Peacock
    .
  • edited May 2013
    Friar wrote: »
    Just a head's up, the doctor's name has apparently been leaked, thanks to early shipping of the DVD boxset in america. So good luck avoiding it for the next week.

    MOFFAT SMASH!!!

    Also, bribe - http://www.bleedingcool.com/2013/05/12/hey-internet-keep-quiet-about-doctor-who-and-get-a-special-reward/
  • edited May 2013
    Okay, that's enough incentive to not look for any pirated version.

    *sigh*

    Now all I need to find is a live stream of BBC 1.
  • edited May 2013
    Screencap from next week's:
    2ccyf0je0az1000

    Gotta say the info's all out there regarding some of the "odes to the past" that are in the episode and I'm greatly looking forward to the first few minutes. :D
Sign in to comment in this discussion.