Doctor Who: Series 5 (/31) Discussion

11516182021

Comments

  • edited September 2010
    I just kinda love that entire conversation between the Daleks and the Cybermen.

    the cult of skaro where the bitches daleks ever.

    EDIT skaro was on my spell check o_0
  • edited September 2010
    I came across This awesome video today, and it really made me think a time war film/serial could work. In fact, I think it would be the ideal plot for the 50th anniversary episode in 2013! Without a doubt, amongst the coolest fan-made videos i've seen!
  • edited September 2010
    Friar wrote: »
    I came across This awesome video today, and it really made me think a time war film/serial could work. In fact, I think it would be the ideal plot for the 50th anniversary episode in 2013! Without a doubt, amongst the coolest fan-made videos i've seen!

    Oh really? Look at that User's amazing Fanedit The Ten Doctors.
  • edited September 2010
    Oh really? Look at that User's amazing Fanedit The Ten Doctors.

    I watched the first two parts of this. Is is finished yet?
  • edited September 2010
    I watched the first two parts of this. Is is finished yet?

    Part Three coming in 10ish days. Dunno if it's the last one or not.
  • edited September 2010
    Part Three coming in 10ish days. Dunno if it's the last one or not.

    Thanks, I think I'll keep an eye out for it. The first two were absolutely fantastic.
  • edited September 2010
    According to Blogtor Who, The title of the Neil Gaiman episode in series six is (for maybe) titled "What are Little Boys Made Of". This surprises me not at all.

    Oh, also, Casting stuff in the same post
    http://blogtorwho.blogspot.com/2010/09/series-6-casting-update.html#comments
  • edited September 2010
    So, the way I thought the returning enemies every season were going to work was that S1=1st Doctor (Daleks), S2=2nd (Cybermen, even though they first appeared in Final First Doctor, S3=3rd(Master), S4=4th(Davros, as Sontarans were 3rd Doctor), but then Series 5 messed that up with the Silurians not being a fifth doctor enemy, which would perfectly align Series 6 for the Valeyard.
  • edited September 2010
    So, the way I thought the returning enemies every season were going to work was that S1=1st Doctor (Daleks), S2=2nd (Cybermen, even though they first appeared in Final First Doctor, S3=3rd(Master), S4=4th(Davros, as Sontarans were 3rd Doctor), but then Series 5 messed that up with the Silurians not being a fifth doctor enemy, which would perfectly align Series 6 for the Valeyard.

    Well, the Silurians were sort of there at the end along with all the Doctor's other enemies. So, maybe we're still on track for the Valeyard? *hopeful face*




    ...The Valeyard is sorta my favorite villain in the entire Doctor Who canon. :D
  • edited September 2010
    Awesome.

    Apparently, Prince Edward was supposed to be in an episode a while back.

    Also, is anyone else going to see Doctor who live next month? Tickets are still on sale! It's supposed to be like an episode, based on the Jon Pertwee story, Carnival of monsters. Heres a trailer. Apparently Matt Smith is going to be there on opening night, Moffat is supposed to be attending all the nights, and Nick Briggs (voice of the daleks) is playing Winston Churchill.
  • edited September 2010
    I just saw this picture and started giggling.

    detail-100916.jpg
  • edited September 2010
    @Alcoremortis: Is that real?

    Reminds me of something, didn’t Star Wars sell popsicles that looked like battle droids when Episode I came out?
  • edited September 2010
    @Alcoremortis: Is that real?

    Reminds me of something, didn’t Star Wars sell popsicles that looked like battle droids when Episode I came out?

    I think it was on a shirt somewhere.

    In other news, I picked up my "grow your own Weeping angel" today!
    photo0147m.jpg
    It's just a bit bigger than a 50p piece at the moment. Not bad, considering it can only grow when you aren't looking at it!
  • edited September 2010
    @Alcoremortis: Is that real?

    As Friar already said, it came from a T-shirt. A brilliantly designed T-shirt I might add. :D
  • edited September 2010
    As Friar already said, it came from a T-shirt. A brilliantly designed T-shirt I might add. :D

    I want that shirt! :cool:
  • edited September 2010
    Apparently, Katy manning (Jo grant, 3rd doctors assistant) will be in an episode of SJA (which starts next month) entitled "death of the doctor"
    Picture+4.png

    Also, if anyone has twitter, follow @rclarkie, he's tweeting stuff from the filming set (episode 4 at the moment, and it involves giant feet) of Doctor who.
  • edited September 2010
  • edited September 2010
    Given the success of the first series, we'd be daft not to recomission
    [Rage]Success? What success? The game was bland! They took an awesome concept of a Doctor Who Adventure game and somehow screwed up! Every episodes "plot" feels like an excuse plot, the "adventure games" part seems tacked on since most of the puzzles are solved with a puzzle that belongs with the flash game section on the Doctor Who website, the characters faces look plain wrong and while Matt and Karen are good actors their voice acting (along with the other voice acters) is bland in this game. Why do I get the feeling he's confused a lot of downloads with people liking the game?
    But it's not just about the numbers; the feedback we've had has been overwhelmingly positive
    Wait positive feedback? Who the hell were they asking that gave them that?[/Rage]

    On a side note why do I feel like I belong on thatguywiththeglasses.com now?
  • edited September 2010
    Well, whadya expect for free on the internets.
  • edited September 2010
    Remolay wrote: »
    Well, whadya expect for free on the internets.

    It isn't free if you don't live in the UK, also it doesn't change the fact that the promised a Doctor Who adventure game where you can explore the TARDIS and they gave us a game on par with the flash games and two rooms of the TARDIS and only one of them is new.
  • edited September 2010
    It's annoying that they comissioned a second series with the same developer (assuming they are sticking with Sumo Digital). For me, the only plus points are that it contains little tidbits of information via the cards, and the plots of the first two games were somewhat decent. They have alot of work to make the series better, and they would be far better of getting TTG to do the games!

    @StLouisRibs: Have you picked up any of the BF audios yet? Is so, which ones?
  • edited September 2010
    Friar wrote: »
    It's annoying that they comissioned a second series with the same developer (assuming they are sticking with Sumo Digital). For me, the only plus points are that it contains little tidbits of information via the cards, and the plots of the first two games were somewhat decent. They have alot of work to make the series better, and they would be far better of getting TTG to do the games!

    @StLouisRibs: Have you picked up any of the BF audios yet? Is so, which ones?

    Oh, I keep putting that off. After I pick up the Borderlands DLC next week, I'll be starting a weekly reverse order by Doctor. So Master, Davros, Spare Parts, Chimes of Midnight, then back to 7th with a different one I haven't decided on yet.
  • edited September 2010
    Time to put my critics hat on!
    Kotaku wrote:
    With the first three episodes downloaded more than 1.6 million times and a fourth episode on the way, the BBC reveals plans to continue the groundbreaking Doctor Who: The Adventure Games with a second season in 2011.
    Groundbreaking in the sense that they didn't suck as much as people thought they would. Still weren't very good, mind.
    Kotaku wrote:
    Doctor Who: The Adventure Games has been a tremendous success for the BBC and developer Sumo Digital
    It was only a success because you charged people outside the UK for it, and I'll bet most of them felt totally ripped off.
    Kotaku wrote:
    Not only giving gamers a way to connect with the 11th Doctor and his companion Amy Pond outside of the television series
    Find me someone who genuinely connected with the main characters, what with their stiff animations and emotionless voices. Go on. Find someone. I'll wait. I'll be over here, getting on with my life.
    Kotaku wrote:
    But also giving a large number of non-gaming fans their first taste of PC gaming.
    Most of whom will now never play another video game ever again. Thanks, guys.
    Kotaku wrote:
    "Given the success of the first series, we'd be daft not to recomission," says Simon Nelson, head of multiplatform in vision, BBC. "But it's not just about the numbers; the feedback we've had has been overwhelmingly positive."
    Show me this feedback, and I will show you a poorly spelled e-mail from a five year old. Most everyone I've met who's played these games has very little to say about them that's good. I suspect you're 'massaging the figures' with that little line, Simon. Either that or you're not looking at reviews or fan forums. Which you're probably not, to be honest.
    Kotaku wrote:
    "Our audience has been introduced to a new form of drama"
    I think you need to look up the meaning of the word 'drama', because your DW games have practically none, and I suspect that tiny amount that you do have was entirely accidental.
    Kotaku wrote:
    "And, for many, these have been the first computer games they have downloaded.
    I've already commented on that, but to re-iterate: If this is the first video game that people have played, then you have put most of them off video games for life. That will be your legacy, and I hope you're proud of yourself.
    Kotaku wrote:
    "We've set new standards in audience participation - and we think we've really helped push the concept of families actively playing together.
    Now that's just a load of rubbish. Families have always played video games together - mostly because the kids are too young to really get to grips with the games. Watch a kid try to play Scooby Doo or something and you'll see what I mean. Just because you've managed to move that onto the PC does not mean you've revolutionized the concept, just as making it a game about Doctor Who rather than Scooby Doo does not mean you've made a work of art instead of a mindless piece of electronic 'entertainment'. The only way you've improved things is by getting kids to play your particular game, and I'm willing to bet that most of them would have as much fun with a stick as they would with this.
    Kotaku wrote:
    "I can't wait to see what the team does next."
    I can. And unless you drastically improve the quality of these 'games', I'll happily wait until the end of time.
  • edited September 2010
    Apparently BBC didn't have any high expectation for these games, so who can blame calling it a success. I did like some of the plots though, first two episodes were interesting but the third was a completely missed opportunity.

    With the lousy quality of the episodic games, it does bring certain insecurity about the quality of the future Wii- and DS games. Are they going to suffer the same blandness or will they actually be good?
  • edited September 2010
    Well, maybe with all the "overwhelming positive support" they've been getting, they'll put more effort and money into the next set of games.

    ....

    Nah, I can't keep a straight face while typing that.
  • edited September 2010
    I still want to know who did they ask that gave them good feedback?
  • edited September 2010
    Apparently BBC didn't have any high expectation for these games, so who can blame calling it a success. I did like some of the plots though, first two episodes were interesting but the third was a completely missed opportunity.

    With the lousy quality of the episodic games, it does bring certain insecurity about the quality of the future Wii- and DS games. Are they going to suffer the same blandness or will they actually be good?

    Well, put it this way: They felt the need to include a sonic screwdriver wiimote/stylus to add an incentive to buying the game. Actually, do those come with the games?
  • edited September 2010
    Friar wrote: »
    Well, put it this way: They felt the need to include a sonic screwdriver wiimote/stylus to add an incentive to buying the game. Actually, do those come with the games?

    I don't think so. They'll probably make some special bundles but I don't think they would make it standard.
  • edited September 2010
    Mr Nutt wrote: »
    I still want to know who did they ask that gave them good feedback?

    Non-gamers, presumably. People who have only a vague idea of what "computer games" look like are probably quite pleased and impressed by how much the game characters resemble the characters from the show.
  • edited September 2010
    Wow, this page has alot of Nerdrage on it!=p (no offense intended: the smily makes up for it all!)

    In other news, I only need a pair of braces, and my 11th doctor costume will be complee!
  • edited September 2010
    And a fez. Fez's are cool.
  • edited September 2010
    And a fez. Fez's are cool.

    I wish one of the new doctors would wear a hat. The main reason I like McCoy is because of that Hat, and Davison's hat was really cool too, but he was a good enough doctor that his hat didn't matter. Baker1's sometimes hat... eh.
  • edited September 2010
    I wish one of the new doctors would wear a hat. The main reason I like McCoy is because of that Hat, and Davison's hat was really cool too, but he was a good enough doctor that his hat didn't matter. Baker1's sometimes hat... eh.

    Could be a nice idea for the next season of the episodic games. Each game could have one special outfit the player has to unlock and the outfits could either be from an earlier incarnation of the Doctor or something unique like the fez doctor. Good idea or bad idea?
  • edited September 2010
    Could be a nice idea for the next season of the episodic games. Each game could have one special outfit the player has to unlock and the outfits could either be from an earlier incarnation of the Doctor or something unique like the fez doctor. Good idea or bad idea?

    No wait a sec I've got a better idea for season two... A competent game company that can make adventure games!
  • edited September 2010
    Some screenshots have appeared of the wii/DS games. Sorry about the page stretch!
    ds_screenshot_3.jpg

    ds_screenshot_1.jpg

    ds_screenshot_2.jpg

    wii_screenshot_1.jpg
    wii_screenshot_2.jpg
    wii_screenshot_3.jpg

    In other news, the Cardiff Doctor who exhibition is going to
    close down next year (In march), and is going to be replaced
    with a "fully interactive experience" in 2012.
  • edited September 2010
    oooh, a cyber commander.

    Looks like they will fit for the systems, but Where the heck is Rory?
  • edited September 2010
    Remolay wrote: »
    oooh, a cyber commander.

    Looks like they will fit for the systems, but Where the heck is Rory?
    Good point! I keep forgetting about him.

    Anyway, it seems like the DS game at least is a Point'n click adventure game, which is nice. The wii version looks more action orientated (it seems to have a health bar) Which version will everyone be picking up (if any)?
  • edited September 2010
    looks more like the DS one will be a puzzle game to me. and I like how the Wii one has a meter for how far away you are from Amy/The Doctor.

    I'll get the Wii one if we Americans ever get them.
Sign in to comment in this discussion.