You don't have to read those articles if you don't like them. You can just read the other ones and why am I justifying this to you when I already know your mind is set and I've no hope of changing it.
I like Kotaku. You don't. Hence, you get your news elsewhere. Can't we just leave it at that?
You don't have to read those articles if you don't like them. You can just read the other ones and why am I justifying this to you when I already know your mind is set and I've no hope of changing it.
I like Kotaku. You don't. Hence, you get your news elsewhere. Can't we just leave it at that?
I basically agree with you. BUT it is your own fault for linking these articles way too often.
But... then it won't be as fun! You... you PARENT.
Seriously though, maybe make it so that new forum members can't start a new thread until they've made 5 posts or something. Enough for them to introduce themselves (and weed out any spambots) but not so many that it puts people off - plus it'd have the benefit of stopping people from registering just to complain about how the latest Walking Dead is late or just plain sux because they killed off someone.
One of the reasons why members should not reply to spambots is that the forum itself wants to punish them for it. And I can not guarantee that I won't ever forget to uncheck this darn box.
One of the reasons why members should not reply to spambots is that the forum itself wants to punish them for it. And I can not guarantee that I won't ever forget to uncheck this darn box.
Thanks for reporting anyway!!
I don't know what method you use to delete spam threads, but I have yet to see Coolsome's name appear in the ban box when I delete a spam thread he's replied to. It's only supposed to affect the OP.
Lets sell a burger called the King Henry for $50 people will assume its giant and then we give them one of those tiny burgers with a tooth pick in them you get at posh partys.
Comments
You don't have to read those articles if you don't like them. You can just read the other ones and why am I justifying this to you when I already know your mind is set and I've no hope of changing it.
I like Kotaku. You don't. Hence, you get your news elsewhere. Can't we just leave it at that?
I basically agree with you. BUT it is your own fault for linking these articles way too often.
I'm out.
All of our other disputes about Kotaku aside, this post from Black Dynamite proves your awesomeness.
I just want to cut..I mean hug HUGGING IS WHAT I MEANT!!
But my hug!
Seriously though, maybe make it so that new forum members can't start a new thread until they've made 5 posts or something. Enough for them to introduce themselves (and weed out any spambots) but not so many that it puts people off - plus it'd have the benefit of stopping people from registering just to complain about how the latest Walking Dead is late or just plain sux because they killed off someone.
But then the amount of people on the TTG fourms would go down a lot!
Its quality over quantity! That's why I'm a loner.
...wait.
Thanks for reporting anyway!!
Edit: does this actually resemble the true post count including deleted & off topic section posts? Interesting.
I don't know what method you use to delete spam threads, but I have yet to see Coolsome's name appear in the ban box when I delete a spam thread he's replied to. It's only supposed to affect the OP.
Damn. I need to quickly make three hundred more posts to catch up.
A FLAMETHROWER!l!
Apparently so, if the forum wants to burn everything in the thread to the ground.
Not everything. Just most of the things. Nobody's called for the burning of the report button yet.
Sexy ones?
But seriously The spam attacks are getting worst. Jeez the spambots are even starting to post in other spambots' threads with more spam.
spamception!