Boobs: an artistic discussion

12223242628

Comments

  • edited May 2010
    congratulations everyone for breaking 1000 posts on the boob thread ;) ahahahaha!
  • edited May 2010
    The thought of her as a male doesn't disturb me so much as I just prefer Vivian to be female. Transgenderism is perfectly acceptable grounds for me. Except for Bridget from Guilty Gear. That one does disturb me.

    I totally understand. I think if the French translation was like the English one, the concept of Vivian being male would just "not work" for me. And I totally get preferring a translation to the original, especially if you had access to the translation first or only.

    Here, from Donkey Kong:


    200px-Klump2.jpg


    Not only does he have nipples, but also a navel.
    But when you think about it, is it really that much weirder than making them walk on their rear legs and wear human clothes?

    EDIT: Here, TV tropes has a list of examples.
  • edited May 2010
    aah, that explains why i didn't notice: its obviously from a newer title!
  • edited May 2010
    Well, if you look at this page about King K. Rool, even though he doesn't seem to have nipples, he does have a navel and manboobs.

    Including in Donkey Kong Country.

    Which leads me to believe that it's anthropomorphism and not just a device to tell who's male and who's female (although obviously, it's the primary use of boobs on non-mammals).
  • edited May 2010
    Anthropomorphism: The only way you could make "Animals who are like, humans, but they're like, not" even less understandable.
  • edited May 2010
    Avistew wrote: »
    Here, TV tropes has a list of examples.

    I'm not alone! Every once in a while I'll catch myself trying to use TV Tropes vocabulary on here. And just tonight, I was having a conversation and found myself struggling to find an alternative way to say "lampshaded". And I started reading the site less than a month ago. It's true, TV Tropes Will Ruin Your Vocabulary. And damn fast, too.
  • edited May 2010
    Anthropomorphism: The only way you could make "Animals who are like, humans, but they're like, not" even less understandable.

    Haha sorry, I didn't think of it as an obscure word. Technically it can apply to things other than animals, though. The C.O.P.S. are anthropomorphic machines for instance.
    Although I guess it depends on your definition. "Anthropo" means human and "morph" is shape or form (I love how "form" is kinda like a backward version of "morph"). (EDIT: it comes from Greek, but nether "anthropo" nor "morph" are a complete Greek word either. I don't know much about Greek and Latin, my knowledge tends to stop at "this bit is used to mean that". Just to clarify.)
    So technically I guess it should be things that are given human characteristics physically, but I feel it still applies for non-physical characteristics.

    @Guru: yeah, I can spend a long time on TV Tropes, although not nearly as long as I can on wikipedia. I find it most useful to link to when you want to explain a concept or quickly find a list of examples, since, well, cataloging them is what it does.

    I find that it adds to my vocabulary rather than take from it, though. There are some concepts that didn't really have a name before they gave it one (although it's not like they invented all of the words, either). The way I see it, that's why you end up having trouble finding other words for them: they don't exist.
  • edited May 2010
    Yeah, you're probably right about that. And I've had the Wikipedia problem too, but TV Tropes is so much more effective at completely killing a night for me. And while it does add to your vocabulary, that's what ruins it. Because I know if I'd said "lampshaded" in that conversation I had earlier tonight, my friend wouldn't have had any idea what I was talking about.
  • edited May 2010
    But you could have said "lampshaded" and then explained ("pointing out a flaw and making fun of it" for instance, although it would depend on the context), thereby enriching your friends vocabulary too :p
    But yeah, I get you, if you become impossible to understand it does suck. But the way I see it, you're having trouble explaining a concept to someone who doesn't know a specific word, but if you didn't know that word either, you might not even identify the concept or wrap your mind around it. It would have been just as hard to express it, you just wouldn't have known that.
    So you're still better off.

    Plus a lot of the words are rather self-explanatory, which helps.
  • edited May 2010
    Hmm...perhaps. Anyway, to bring the thread full circle back to boobs, here's several breast-related tropes:

    Buxom is Better
    Big Breasts Big Deal
    Most Common Superpower
    Gainaxing (which is what the whole Dead or Alive conversation was about)
    Boobs of Steel
    Big Bra to Fill
    Gag Boobs
    Marshmallow Hell
    Funbag Airbag
    Thanks for the Mammaries
  • edited May 2010

    God, it's like going to a bad pun making factory!
  • edited May 2010
    Yeah...that's pretty much standard for TV Tropes article titles.
  • edited May 2010
    Hehe, I love doing Marshmallow Hell (didn't know there was a word for it!). It's sadistic and charitable at the same time, I love it!

    Other links that aren't really tropes but discuss breast sizes:
    - Conversion from "real sizes" to "comic/anime/manga sizes". That is, what's "average" in both, etc.
    It seems wrong in that it puts the European cups as the same as the Japanese and different from the US/UK ones, and I can assure you that's US cups and EUR cups are the same.
    - Useful note on bra sizes in case you don't know how they work.
  • edited May 2010
    I'm not alone! Every once in a while I'll catch myself trying to use TV Tropes vocabulary on here. And just tonight, I was having a conversation and found myself struggling to find an alternative way to say "lampshaded". And I started reading the site less than a month ago. It's true, TV Tropes Will Ruin Your Vocabulary. And damn fast, too.

    Just so you know, the term "lampshade hanging" predates TVTropes by many years.
  • edited May 2010
    Brainiac wrote: »
    Just so you know, the term "lampshade hanging" predates TVTropes by many years.

    Yeah, but I assume that's where he learned it. TV Tropes didn't invent most of the terms it's using, it took them from various sources, but that's still where a lot of people first heard of terms and therefore they contribute to its use.

    Although I have to say I feel lampshade hanging was indeed commonly used before TV tropes even existed. This being said, now you're apparently supposed to say "lampshading" instead.
  • edited May 2010
    I was aware that lampshade hanging predated TV Tropes, but as Avistew surmised, that is where I learned it, so I assumed it to not be very widely used and therefore assumed that the person I was talking to wouldn't know it.
  • VainamoinenVainamoinen Moderator
    edited May 2010
    Irishmile wrote: »
    Its possible comic books could fill its own thread... its a balance of what is real and what people want to see... but that could be the very definition of all art

    James Gurney would agree, but he doesn't really paint boobs with a certain... kick. You posted a picture from Adam Hughes, who always draws well-endowed women. I'll post links to his sites and a picture that pretty much defines his work.

    http://adamhughes.deviantart.com/
    http://www.justsayah.com/

    Adam Hughes never went to art school. He is entirely self-taught. It really doesn't show. ;)

    PGLondon.jpg
  • TorTor
    edited May 2010
    Did anyone else spot this? (link to video)

    2z6fdvp.png
  • edited May 2010
    We're famous!
    Then again, it's an active thread, it's probably the last updated thread often enough.
  • edited May 2010
    Tor wrote: »
    Did anyone else spot this? (link to video)

    2z6fdvp.png

    -breaks character- AH... AHA... HAAAAAAAAAHAAAAAAHAAAAAA!!!!! That's so awesome!!! -character again.- Who cares if they show that? It's the free market, and they can do whatever they please. If anyone has a problem with that, I suggest they develop a better product to compete.
  • edited May 2010
    i like how they asked gamepro to register
  • edited June 2010
    When exactly do we consider a thread as 'died' on these forums?
  • edited June 2010
    When it only gets posted in to ask what happened to the thread.
  • edited June 2010
    This is a sad day, when nobody cares about boobs and/or art anymore :(

    I gave the link to SeanT, but he didn't want to go there from work.
  • edited June 2010
    Avistew wrote: »
    This is a sad day, when nobody cares about boobs and/or art anymore :(

    I gave the link to SeanT, but he didn't want to go there from work.

    I think the knowledge that the thread is famous killed it off. Some people just don't want to be seen frequenting 'boob' threads. Others don't want to be seen frequenting 'art' threads.

    Some people just liked it when it was 'their' thread, you know? Now it's 'everyone's'.

    If you 'understand' what I'm 'saying'.
  • edited June 2010
    Avistew wrote: »
    This is a sad day, when nobody cares about boobs and/or art anymore :(

    I gave the link to SeanT, but he didn't want to go there from work.

    I care about boobs :D I care so much I spend 3 hours a day admiring them :D ;) jk
    or am i?
  • edited June 2010
    Avistew, we need you to boost the thread with another artful picture
  • edited June 2010
    Man, I tried keeping to the topic and posting examples of wonderfully rendered breasts, but you guys didn't even bat an eye at them. Kids these days only care about Avistew's boobs. :(

    Anyhoo, I found these cool pictures of female athletes. I think there was some discussion about the effect of breast size on an athlete's ability to perform? Maybe? Either way, have at them:

    ephlqe.jpg

    2vhzua8.jpg

    majluv.jpg

    15zpf82.jpg

    ad0psn.jpg
  • edited June 2010
    Wow those women need to stop working out and start eating again. They're a little too buff too be normal.
  • edited June 2010
    what a classy comment
  • edited June 2010
    Dude.

    They are athletes.

    EDIT: Also what. Unless you're using steroids, you actually need to eat a lot in order to build that kind of muscle. So uh... yeah, I don't know what you're talking about, brah.
  • edited June 2010
    Dude.

    They are athletes.

    You don't need to look inhuman to be athletes, dude.
  • edited June 2010
    Kids these days only care about Avistew's boobs.

    Speak for yourself. I only care about this woman:

    20508515.png 31154749.png

    Besides, most (if not all) of the pictures Avistew posts seem to be of herself without a bra on under her clothes. I personally like photos of women better when they have support. No offense to Avistew, though. Really.
  • edited June 2010
    splash1 wrote: »
    You don't need to look inhuman to be athletes, dude.

    They look very much like humans and they're doing what they want to do. What's your problem?

    also chyron, she's just kidding around
  • puzzleboxpuzzlebox Telltale Alumni
    edited June 2010
    splash1 wrote: »
    Wow those women need to stop working out and start eating again. They're a little too buff too be normal.

    Riiight... because a woman's entire life should be devoted to making herself attractive to men, rather than the pursuit of excellence in something she loves.

    Those photographs are interesting - I think it's cool how each woman's body is adapted to her chosen sport. For example, the pole vaulter (Stacy Dragella, third from left in 1st pic) has wide, strong shoulders, and the weightlifter (Tara Nott, third from left in 2nd pic) has a really strong core and developed thighs.

    And then I guess in some cases particular women chose particular sports because their bodies are naturally shaped to have an advantage - the basketballers and high jumpers are really tall, the gymnasts and figure skaters are tiny and compact.

    Thanks for posting the pics, DoctorCello.
  • edited June 2010
    i find that gymnasts have smaller boobs. why is this?
  • edited June 2010
    Less fat content your body has, the smaller the boobs. Plus, boobs tend to get in the way when you're doing acrobatics.
  • edited June 2010
    When it comes to pole vaulters, Allison Stokke is definitely a work of art.
  • edited June 2010
    Chyron8472 wrote: »
    Besides, most (if not all) of the pictures Avistew posts seem to be of herself without a bra on under her clothes. I personally like photos of women better when they have support. No offense to Avistew, though. Really.

    None taken :)

    About the athletes, the TVtropes page (I think that's what you're talking about?) did mention that female athletes tended to have small (to almost nonexistent) breasts due to their low fat content (because they're muscular), but that outside of competition and professional sports, you could be athletic (in an average way) and have big breasts.
    Just, obviously, you'd need to still have a fair amount of fat.

    And while I personally don't think the most muscular ones of these women are particularly attractive, I do find the idea that a woman (or a person in general, really) needs to care about her appearance more than her passion offensive.
    Obviously, being professional athletes, they're regularly checked by physicians and are healthy, and that's really what matters.
  • edited June 2010
    Those pictures are very interesting! I think if you just saw a picture of the woman, you could guess what type of sport they excell at.
This discussion has been closed.