Doctor Who: Series 5 (/31) Discussion

17810121321

Comments

  • edited June 2010
    I like RTDs episodes the master ones are my favs
  • edited June 2010
    Spoilery wallpapers are now at the Doctor Who site.

    It took eveything in me not to click that link
  • edited June 2010
    Then you're a stronger person then I.
  • edited June 2010
    Friar wrote: »
    Or the giant robot in Victorian London?
    This is something that both Russel and Steven discussed, while that episode was written. At that point, Moffat already was writing season 5, and they teamed up putting in some details.
    Also, in "The next Doctor", Jackson is saying something like "Everyone will remember this event for centuries!" and the Doctor is like "Yeah... funny...".

    Unfortunately I dont have a link that backs this up, but it was mentioned in Russels Book "The Writers Tale" somewhere.
  • edited June 2010
    Majus wrote: »
    This is something that both Russel and Steven discussed, while that episode was written. At that point, Moffat already was writing season 5, and they teamed up putting in some details.
    Also, in "The next Doctor", Jackson is saying something like "Everyone will remember this event for centuries!" and the Doctor is like "Yeah... funny...".

    Unfortunately I dont have a link that backs this up, but it was mentioned in Russels Book "The Writers Tale" somewhere.

    I read on Dr Who wiki that Russtle let Steven plant hints in his storys this and the Daleks where the main ones (if not only ones)
  • edited June 2010
    I like RTDs episodes the master ones are my favs

    There's a difference between being able to enjoy the Master and being able to "believe" the story being told. For example, I thought the Master was very well played, especially in EoT, but I rather hated the way that a lot of the plot elements were coming together, especially in the finale for series 3. It was too unbelievable, and therefore lost its magic.
  • edited June 2010
    Nimeni wrote: »
    There's a difference between being able to enjoy the Master and being able to "believe" the story being told. For example, I thought the Master was very well played, especially in EoT, but I rather hated the way that a lot of the plot elements were coming together, especially in the finale for series 3. It was too unbelievable, and therefore lost its magic.

    I was able to belive it and enjoy in fiction when plot elements start to come togeather like it does so it didnt spoil anything for me. Thats why I love RTDs storys
  • edited June 2010
    I like RTDs episodes the master ones are my favs

    Don't get me wrong, he can write some fantastic episodes. He just had trouble Finishing them. "The sound of Drums" for example was easily the best episode (for me) of series 3, but the following episode? Such a let down. They turned the doctor into a god, just because everyone thought of his name? WTF?

    And the I didn't think the Stolen Earth/Journey hom two parter was wrapped up particularly well either. They just flipped a switch. Plus, dragging the earth home would have caused huge Tsunamis (given the amount of quaking they showed), plus the Moon would have catapulted out somewhere. And i didn't like how he made Aliens as a fact in modern society. If you could suspend disbelief, then his episodes were usually quite good, but they never seemed to finish quite right.

    I wouldn't call him a bad writer (far from it. Without him, i wouldn't have even heard of Doctor who, and i doubt it would have been as successful), but i think Moffetis capable of much more. He's been able to take what Russel created (like the refference the finale throughout thing), and expand it into so much more. Like the cracks in time. I just love how we've been steadily finding out more as we go along, as opposed to just a few posters here and there, or a few refferences. Although it would be nice to have some more of those aswell!

    @ Majus: I really need to pick that book up sometime. Any good?
  • edited June 2010
    It took eveything in me not to click that link

    It's not that spoilery. Everything in them i already either new about, or could have extrapolated. Thats not to say you should click it, but if you do, there nothing huge.
  • edited June 2010
    I admit I did feel a bit let down on journey's end but I think the dr becoming on a god on the last of the time lords works cos how it was explanined.
  • edited June 2010
    I admit I did feel a bit let down on journey's end but I think the dr becoming on a god on the last of the time lords works cos how it was explanined.
    I thought it was bit too Deus ex Machina for my tastes. If i could change one thing about RTD's time, it would be that episodes ending. For example, if Martha had been gathering information on the specific date that the Master arrived (aswell as hope, to weaken the satellites grip on them, and allow the Paradox machine to be stopped) which she would tell the doctor/Jack upon her arrival aboard the station. Jack would then use this information to break the paradox machine, reversing time (and the doctors condition). Then the episode would carry on as normal. It doesn't sound as spectacular, but i think it would have made the episodes conclusion more fitting.

    But i guess everyone has different Ideas for their perfect endings.
  • edited June 2010
    I think RTD missed a huge opportunity when he didn't take full advantage of the fact that he had two Doctors (10 and 10.5). I was so certain that the 10.5 Doctor was going to turn evil and find a way back to this universe to wreck havoc. And no one would know that it wasn't the original Doctor...
  • edited June 2010
    Friar wrote: »
    -Stuff about RTD-
    Once again, I've written an article about that.
  • edited June 2010
    I think RTD missed a huge opportunity when he didn't take full advantage of the fact that he had two Doctors (10 and 10.5).

    You mean like how he also missed a huge opportunity with the Doctor Donna.
  • edited June 2010
    Mr Nutt wrote: »
    You mean like how he also missed a huge opportunity with the Doctor Donna.

    I call Doctor Donna 10.5 because it saves time. I am soooo lazy.:p
  • edited June 2010
    I still hope they do something with Donna-- a sort of re-awakening, someway to balance out what she's become. Of course, that seems unlikely now, but I can still hope, can't I? :D
  • edited June 2010
    Well if the Doctor Donna is supposed to be half Time Lord (I can't remember where I found that out from) doesn't that mean if something was going to kill Donna she would subconsciously regenerate?
  • edited June 2010
    but her brain would burn out, which it for some reason didn't in The End of Time. (yeah, nifty plot hole you dug there RTD)

    Seriously, why Didn't Donna's brain burn out at that point?
  • edited June 2010
    I think RTD missed a huge opportunity when he didn't take full advantage of the fact that he had two Doctors (10 and 10.5). I was so certain that the 10.5 Doctor was going to turn evil and find a way back to this universe to wreck havoc. And no one would know that it wasn't the original Doctor...
    Well, maybe thats what Moffats doing now?
    Seeing as everyone thinks it is the doctor who's causing the end of the universe, as only he can control the TARDIS.
    I'll have a read of that!

    Also, Here's the trailer for the next adventure game "Blood of the Cybermen" Due out on Saturday.
  • edited June 2010
    Friar wrote: »
    Well, maybe thats what Moffats doing now?
    Seeing as everyone thinks it is the doctor who's causing the end of the universe, as only he can control the TARDIS.

    This is consolation I suppose. But nothing could have beat the fact that RTD had a perfect excuse to make use of the evil twin thing and didn't use it. And now, with David Tennant out of the mix, it can't be used by anyone else either (except fanfic writers).
  • edited June 2010
    Remolay wrote: »
    but her brain would burn out, which it for some reason didn't in The End of Time. (yeah, nifty plot hole you dug there RTD)

    Seriously, why Didn't Donna's brain burn out at that point?

    As I understand it the Doctor put some sort of defense mechanism in her brain that would trigger that knock-out wavey thing, whatever that was supposed to be, as well as wipe her memory a bit apparently, all triggered by her starting to remember. Of course, he never really did properly explain that one.


    So, the games. City of the Daleks really didn't seem to reveal anything new and significant. It seemed very much a stand alone episode. This cyberman one seems like it very well might be the same way. Do you think we'll actually get anything significant to the plot in these little "episodes" or are they all going to be pretty much stand alone, self-contained? Considering they'll finish being released after the tv series ends, it doesn't seem too likely we'll get anything significant to that plot-- unless it's meant to lead into the new series. What do you think?
  • edited June 2010
    Nimeni wrote: »
    As I understand it the Doctor put some sort of defense mechanism in her brain that would trigger that knock-out wavey thing, whatever that was supposed to be, as well as wipe her memory a bit apparently, all triggered by her starting to remember. Of course, he never really did properly explain that one.


    So, the games. City of the Daleks really didn't seem to reveal anything new and significant. It seemed very much a stand alone episode. This cyberman one seems like it very well might be the same way. Do you think we'll actually get anything significant to the plot in these little "episodes" or are they all going to be pretty much stand alone, self-contained? Considering they'll finish being released after the tv series ends, it doesn't seem too likely we'll get anything significant to that plot-- unless it's meant to lead into the new series. What do you think?

    I don't think they'll relate to the main series too much, but i wouldn't be surprised if the games are all interconnected somehow.
  • edited June 2010
    He's either...

    (a) written a brilliant solution that's both obvious and makes total sense and has been carefully placed in the series since the very beginning of Series 5.

    Well, I'm pretty sure I remember at the end of the very first episode you see
    little Amy Pond still waiting out in her garden for the Tardis to come back and then you hear it actually DOES come back and a hand extend out to her and she smiles and hops up.

    So the Doctor going back and picking up the little girl has been implanted from the very beginning.
  • edited June 2010
    I hope that all the inconsistencies throughout the series will be explained.
    Like maybe Rory's incorrect hospital ID (it says the picture was taken in 1990, which would make him one of the youngest nurses ever) is a side effect of him being eaten by the crack...or being made out of plastic.
  • edited June 2010
    I thought it showed us Amy's bedroom, finishing on the wedding dress.

    [/Sarcasm]

    I don't recall the hand, but I do remember young Amelia 'hearing' the TARDIS again. Maybe you're right.
  • edited June 2010
    I hope that all the inconsistencies throughout the series will be explained.
    Like maybe Rory's incorrect hospital ID (it says the picture was taken in 1990, which would make him one of the youngest nurses ever) is a side effect of him being eaten by the crack...or being made out of plastic.
    Or the fact that at the end of the last episode
    You could see all the stars exploding simultaneously, yet the light should have reached the view point at different times, years apart.
  • edited June 2010
    Friar wrote: »
    Or the fact that at the end of the last episode
    You could see all the stars exploding simultaneously, yet the light should have reached the view point at different times, years apart.

    Oooh! Good one!

    Or my personal favorite:
    The TARDIS is towing the Earth and the teacups are rattling. No hurricanes or tsunamis. Just the teacups.
    .
  • edited June 2010
    Wait, the
    stars exploding all at once
    ? I thought it was just
    rips in the space-time continuum
    or something of that sort.
  • edited June 2010
    The new Adventure game episode has launched! Installing now.
    Just a reminder, tonights episode is on at the earlier time of 6.05PM, and is longer.
  • puzzleboxpuzzlebox Telltale Alumni
    edited June 2010
    Friar wrote: »
    Just a reminder, tonights episode is on at the earlier time of 6.05PM, and is longer.

    Oh thank you, I would have missed the start if you hadn't said! I knew there was a reason I hang out here. :)
  • edited June 2010
    puzzlebox wrote: »
    Oh thank you, I would have missed the start if you hadn't said! I knew there was a reason I hang out here. :)

    I probably would have aswell, if it wasn't for twitter!

    Mini Review of Blood of the Cybermen

    Upon playing the second episode of the Adventure games, it is apparent that they have taken on board some of the criticisms of the previous episodes; Stealth sections are alot less frequent, only really appearing in the last part. Whilst the actual Adventuring elements haven't gotten anymore difficult (well, there is one slightly complex puzzle at the end), the minigames have gotten more complicated (well, one has). As for the storyline, for the most part it's pretty decent, but it comes to a rather sudden, abrupt end.Oh, and the Voice acting and animation seem to have improved.

    I did accidentally find a glitch though. I was running away from a cyberman, and ran into a new area, activating a cutscene. However, the moment the cutscene was activated, Amy was Deleted (by the chasing cyberman, off screen), screamed, and appeared in front of me, surrounded by a blue glow.
  • edited June 2010
    that was beautiful!
  • edited June 2010
    It was ok i guess. Did he actually ever say what
    the voice in the TARDIS was, and what caused it to explode?
  • edited June 2010
    Fezes are cool.
  • edited June 2010
    Friar wrote: »
    It was ok i guess. Did he actually ever say what
    the voice in the TARDIS was, and what caused it to explode?

    they
    left it open so this wasnt just a one sesion arc that gets replaced by somthing bigger the mysterys still there. I think it might be river o_0

    also
    why didnt anything happen when amy touched amelia
  • edited June 2010
    Friar wrote: »
    It was ok i guess. Did he actually ever say what
    the voice in the TARDIS was, and what caused it to explode?
    Nope. My guess - that's the next series arc.

    Well, that episode was brilliant. Mad, clever and brilliant. But there was one major disappointment - it didn't reveal the title of the Christmas special! Blasphemy!
  • edited June 2010
    I gotta admit usually in this type of thing I'm
    yelling who's the villain who!?!? but this time I was to capitulated with the story to give it a thought and I really like they didn't reveal it something that can destroy the universe doesn't deserve to be beat in one episode
  • edited June 2010
    I gotta admit usually in this type of thing I'm
    yelling who's the villain who!?!? but this time I was to capitulated with the story to give it a thought and I really like they didn't reveal it something that can destroy the universe doesn't deserve to be beat in one episode
    I can't take 6 months (almost exactly!) of speculation!
    I can't wait for the series to come out on BD/DVD. I wonder which shop will be doing the special edition boxset this year, and what'll be on it...
  • puzzleboxpuzzlebox Telltale Alumni
    edited June 2010
    Some madly beautiful stuff in this one. I loved it.

    And a new episode of Doctor Who will be a great Christmas present! :)
  • edited June 2010
    I cant get over how good it was
    It was different from anything on TV different from every other finale in doctor who history it was just awesome behond all expectations I had
Sign in to comment in this discussion.